judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

MUNSHELL VS. MUNSHELL

Case Information: 40075
Short Caption:MUNSHELL VS. MUNSHELLCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 35640 , 42108
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D211277Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:09/25/2002How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
08/15/2002Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Timothy S. Munshell--Provident Bank check no. 5034170550.
08/15/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 02-13985
08/26/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn2--[NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings).] fn3--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 02-14588
09/25/2002Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. Vols. 1 and 2. 02-16614
09/25/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
12/18/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." SNP03-MS/ML/NB 02-21620
11/16/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. for Extension of Time. This court previously filed an order of affirmance on December 18, 2002. On January 9, 2003, this court received appellant's "Motion to Extend Time," in which he asks this court for additional time to prepare a request to reconsider the December 18 order. As appellant has not demonstrated a sufficient basis for an extension of time, we deny his motion. fn1[NRAP 40(a).] fn2[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered all proper person documents received from appellant and conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] 04-21017
11/16/2004RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols. 1 and 2 this day. 04-21025
11/16/2004Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
11/30/2004Other Returned Mail. Order filed 11/16/04 addressed to Timothy Munshell remailed to corrected address.
12/01/2004RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on November 18, 2004. 04-21025