| Case Information: 40178 | |||
| Short Caption: | STRUCTURE CONTROL VS. OLSON | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 40259 , 43497 , 44602 , 49671 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A382809 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 09/11/2002 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Beckley Singleton--check no. 092773. | ||
| 09/11/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) (Notice of exemption from settlement program mailed to all counsel.) | 02-15749 | |
| 09/30/2002 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 02-16798 | |
| 10/14/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Appellants shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, file and serve a transcript request form or certificate of no transcript request. | 02-17690 | |
| 10/24/2002 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from law firm of Hutchison & Steffen stating that they do not represent respondents Aztec Plastering, and enclosing a Substitution of Attorney filed in district court on 12/29/00, substituting the law firm of Ryder & Caspino for Aztec Plastering. | 02-18440 | |
| 10/28/2002 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. | 02-18548 | |
| 10/31/2002 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Beckley Singleton--check no. 093507. | ||
| 10/31/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 02-18780 | |
| 11/26/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Response due from appellants: 30 days from the date of this order. fn4[We note that appellants may be able to cure the jurisdictional defect perceived in this appeal by obtaining from the district court a written order dismissing all claims, cross-claims, and third-party claims against the parties listed above, and then filing in the district court an amended notice of appeal.] The briefing schedule in this appeal shall be suspended pending further order of this court. Respondent may file any reply within 10 days from the date that appellants' response is served. | 02-20359 | |
| 12/30/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. | 02-22176 | |
| 01/28/2003 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Amended Response to Order to Show Cause. | 03-01477 | |
| 02/19/2003 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." NNP03-RR/WM/MG | 03-02771 | |
| 03/18/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 03-02806 | |
| 03/18/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 03/26/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 20, 2003. | 03-02806 | |