| Case Information: 44279 | |||
| Short Caption: | BISHOP (DERRICK) VS. WARDEN | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 39347 , 44668 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR982930 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Criminal - Proper Person Writ Petition |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 11/19/2004 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 11/19/2004 | Petition/Writ | Filed Proper Person Petition for Writ. Petitioner for Writ of Mandamus to Order Appeal when the Lower District Court will not Send it to the Nevada Supreme Court Clerk to Docket. | 04-21382 | |
| 12/01/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. to Respond. This court directs the State within 20 days from the date of this order to respond to this order and inform this court whether the district court has resolved petitioner's habeas corpus petition, whether a notice of appeal was filed in the district court, and if a notice of appeal was filed, why a writ should not issue to cause the clerk of the district court to immediately transmit the notice of appeal to this court. If a notice of appeal was not filed in the district court, the State, as the custodian of the logs maintained by the Department of Corrections, should examine the notice of appeal log and legal mail log to determine if a notice of appeal was sent to the district court on or around May 13, 2004. fn4[The State should transmit to this court copies of any documents that would assist this court in resolving this matter.] | 04-21880 | |
| 12/17/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. | 04-23090 | |
| 12/29/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. On December 1, 2004, this court entered an order directing the State to respond to a proper person petition for a writ of mandamus. On December 17, 2004, the State filed a motion for enlargement of time to file the response. The State requests an additional forty-five days to file their response. Good cause appearing, this court grants the State's motion to file a response on or before February 4, 2005. | 04-23620 | |
| 02/04/2005 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. | 05-02362 | |
| 03/03/2005 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. "ORDER the petition DENIED." fn5[On February 4, 2005, this court received a second motion for extension of time from the State to file a response. The issue to be addressed in the State's response has been rendered moot. Thus, no response is required in this matter.] SNP05-RR/MG/JH | 05-04241 | |
| 03/29/2005 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 05-04580 | |
| 03/29/2005 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||