judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

SHARMA (SONU) VS. STATE

Case Information: 36182
Short Caption:SHARMA (SONU) VS. STATECourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 34944 , 36183
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR982926Classification:Criminal Appeal - Life - Direct
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:06/11/2001 at 11:00 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:06/11/2001How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
05/24/2000Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
05/24/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Fast track appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.) 00-08754
07/10/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-11761
07/18/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Fast Track. Counsel for appellant has not filed, in this court, the file-stamped copies of the rough draft transcript request forms and proof of service as required by NRAP 3C(h)(3). Counsel for appellant shall, within 20 days of this order, show cause why he should not be sanctioned for his failure to comply with the requirements of NRAP 3C (h)(3). The motion for an extension of tme in which to file the fast track statement is granted. The fast track statement and appendix shall be filed and served within 30 days of this order. No further extensions shall be permitted absent extreme and unforeseeable circumstances. 00-12438
07/24/2000MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. 00-12713
08/03/2000TranscriptFiled Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: October 4, 1999 (2). Court Reporter: Erin T. Luschar. 00-13452
08/11/2000TranscriptFiled Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: 09/29/00 (2). Court Reporter: Debora Cecere. 00-14086
08/14/2000TranscriptFiled Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: 09/16/00. Court Reporter: Gail West-Willsey. 00-14164
08/16/2000TranscriptFiled Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: 09/09/99 and 10/01/99. Court Reporter: Gail West-Willsey. 00-14341
08/17/2000TranscriptFiled Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: 09/17/99. Court Reporter: Wendy L. Pearson. 00-14398
08/21/2000TranscriptFiled Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: September 28, 1999. Court Reporter: Wendy Pearson. 00-14614
08/22/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-14743
08/31/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Full Briefing. On August 22, 2000, counsel for appellant filed a motion for an extension of time in which to file the fast track statement. We have determined that full briefing will assist the court in the disposition of this appeal. fn1[The motion for an extension of time in which to file the fast track statement is denied, as moot.] Opening brief and appendix due: 40 days. fn2[We suspend the requirement in NRAP 9 for counsel to file a certified transcript.] Answering brief and reply brief shall be filed in compliance with NRAP 31. 00-15382
09/27/2000BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 9/27/00 (Reno/Carson). 00-17116
09/27/2000AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. Vols. 1 and 2. 00-17117
10/31/2000BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 10/31/00 (Reno/Carson). 00-19176
12/04/2000MotionFiled Motion and Order Extending Time. Brief due: December 14, 2000. 00-21148
12/14/2000BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 12/14/00 (Reno/Carson). 00-21914
04/30/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on June 11, 2001 at 11:00 a.m. in Carson City. (NNP01A-MS/DA/RR)
05/25/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
06/06/2001MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authorities. 01-09468
06/08/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. We grant appellant's June 6, 2001 motion. The clerk of this court shall filed the supplemental authorities received on June 5, 2001. 01-09604
06/08/2001BriefFiled Supplemental Authorities. 01-09397
06/11/2001Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Before the Northern Nevada Panel. NNP01A-MS/DA/RR
06/13/2001MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Bail Pending Appeal. 01-09918
06/14/2001Order/Procedural Order. This appeal was orally argued before the Northern Nevada Panel of this court on June 11, 2001. At the argument, the court posed a question to counsel for the State respecting the validity of Jury Instruction 11. It appears that supplemental briefing on the issue raised during the argument will assist the court in resolving this appeal. The parties shall each file a supplemental brief of not more than 20 pages addressing the following issues: (see No. 1 and 2 of the order). Appellant shall have 20 days from the date of this order to file and serve the appellant's supplemental brief. respondent shall have 20 days from the date of service of appellant's brief to file the respondent's supplemental brief. 01-09997
06/22/2001BriefFiled Supplemental Brief. 01-10597
06/25/2001MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Bail Pending Appeal. 01-10708
06/27/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Appellant Sharma's supplemental brief was filed on June 22, 2001. On June 22, 2001, appellant Vig filed a motion in Docket No. 36183 requesting this court to consider the issues raised in appellant Sharma's supplemental brief in resolving the appeal in Docket No. 36183. We grant the motion. The court shall consider the supplemental brief filed in docket No. 36182 in our resolution of the appeal in Docket No. 36183. fn1[The clerk shall file a copy of appellant Sharma's supplemental brief in Docket No. 36183.] Respondent shall have 20 days from the date of this order to file a single supplemental brief in Docket Nos. 36182 and 36183. Nos. 36182/36183-cases are not consolidated. 01-10843
07/18/2001BriefFiled Supplemental Brief. Respondent's Supplemental Brief. Nos. 36182/36183. 01-12225
09/07/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. Denying Motion for Bail. The district court evidently found that appellant's release on bail posed an unacceptable risk of danger to the community. Exercising our independent judgment, we deem this to be a sufficient justification for denial of bail in this case. We deny appellant's motion for bail pending appeal. 01-15123
10/31/2002Opinion/DispositionalFiled Per Curiam Opinion. "Reversed and remanded." Before Shearing, Agosti and Rose, JJ. Per Curiam. 118 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 69. NNP01A 02-18715
11/26/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 02-18950
11/26/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
12/20/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 2, 2002. 02-18950