SCOTTSDALE DEV., INC. VS. DIST. CT. (BARNA)

Case Information: 40448
Short Caption:	SCOTTSDALE DEV., INC. VS. DIST. CT. (BARNA)	Court:	Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):	Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A417590	Classification:	Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition
Disqualifications:		Case Status:	Disposition Filed/Case Closed
Replacement:		Panel Assigned:	Panel
To SP/Judge:		SP Status:
Oral Argument:		Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:	07/28/2003	How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
Date	Type	Description	Pending?	Document
11/06/2002	Filing Fee	Filing Fee due.
11/06/2002	Petition/Writ	Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition.		02-19103
11/06/2002	Notice/Outgoing	Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
11/06/2002	Notice/Outgoing	Issued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Affidavit. Due Date: 10 days
11/07/2002	Filing Fee	Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Morris Polich & Purdy, LLP--check no. 5002.
11/12/2002	Motion	Filed Motion. Defendant, Scottsdale Development, Inc.'s. Joinder in Defendants/Petitioners' Petition for Writ of Prohibition or, in the alternative, for Writ of Mandamus.		02-19463
11/13/2002	Notice/Outgoing	Issued Notice of Modification of Caption.
11/13/2002	Petition/Writ	Filed Affidavit in Support of Petition for Writ.		02-19533
11/25/2002	Notice/Incoming	Filed Joinder. Defendant Desert Mesa Land Partners, Ltd's Joinder in Defendats/Petitioners' Petition for Writ of Prohibition or, in the alternative, for Writ of Mandamus.		02-20285
11/25/2002	Notice/Outgoing	Issued Notice of Modification of Caption.
01/23/2003	Order/Procedural	Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. The real parties in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ.		03-01224
02/24/2003	Petition/Writ	Filed Answer to Petition for Writ. Answer of Real Parties in Interest, Barna Et Al., to Petition for Writ of Prohibition or, in the Alternative, for Writ of Mandamus.		03-03097
07/25/2003	Notice/Incoming	Filed Notice. Notice of Withdrawal of Petition for Writ of Prohibition or, in the Alternative, for Writ of Mandamus.		03-12628
07/28/2003	Order/Procedural	Filed Order. Oral Argument will not be scheduled and this matter shall stand submitted for decision to the Southern Nevada Panel as of the date of this order on the papers filed herein.		03-12655
07/28/2003	Case Status Update	Submitted for Decision.
08/18/2003	Order/Procedural	Filed Order. Partially Dismissing Petition. Rose Hill and Renaissance Builders have filed a document entitled 'Notice of Withdrawal of Petition for Writ of Prohibition or, in the Alternative, for Writ of Mandamus.' 'We dismiss the petition as to Rose Hill and Renaissance Builders.' Remaining petitioners Scottsdale Development, Inc. and Desert Mesa Land Partners, Ltd. shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file and serve notices indicating that they withdraw their joinders to the petition. In the alternative petitioners shall inform this court in writing if they wish to proceed with the petition.		03-13695
08/28/2003	Motion	Filed Motion to Dismiss Petition. Defendant/Petitioner, Scottsdale Development, Inc.'s Notice of Withdrawal Petition for Writ of Prohibition or, in the Alternative, for Writ of Mandamus.		03-14545
09/24/2003	Order/Dispositional	Filed Order Dismissing Petition. Scottsdale has filed a notice informing this court that "[b]ased upon the settlement by the parties . . . [its joinder to the petition] is hereby withdrawn." To date, Desert has failed to inform this court that it wishes to proceed with its joinder to the petition. "We dismiss this petition as to Scottsdale . . . we dismiss the petition as to Desert as abandoned." This petition is dismissed in its entirety. SNP/CLK		03-15976
09/24/2003	Case Status Update	Case Closed. No notice in lieu of remittitur issued.