| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 07/17/2002 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Leavitt. Law firm of Hale Lane Peek Dennison & Howard. | | |
| 07/17/2002 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Young. Law firm of Lionel Sawyer & Collins. | | |
| 07/17/2002 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Hale Lane Peek Dennison Howard & Anderson--check no. 037167. | | |
| 07/17/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | | 02-12276
|
| 07/29/2002 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Lester H. Berkson. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | | |
| 08/01/2002 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | | 02-13184
|
| 08/01/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. Lester H. Berkson. (Docketing statement) | | |
| 08/16/2002 | Docketing Statement | Filed Response to Docketing Statement. Harris Arizona Rebar's Reply to Appellants' Docketing Statement. | | 02-14000
|
| 08/19/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. Lester H. Berkson. (Response to Docketing Statement) | | |
| 08/19/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice of Appearance. Association of Counsel. Daniel F. Polsenberg enters an appearance as attorney of record for Respondent Harris/Arizona Rebar, Inc. | | 02-14162
|
| 08/22/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. Lester H. Berkson. (Association of Counsel) | | |
| 09/19/2002 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: 30-60 days for further negotiations. | | 02-16341
|
| 10/01/2002 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. | | 02-16999
|
| 10/09/2002 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement. We reinstate the time deadlines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). | | 02-17493
|
| 10/28/2002 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. | | 02-18487
|
| 11/08/2002 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. Supplemental Certificate Regarding Transcripts of Proceedings. | | 02-19323
|
| 11/25/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Respondent's Motion for Partial dismissal of Venetian Casino Resort L.L.C. Et Al.'s Appeal. | | 02-20238
|
| 12/02/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Errata to Respondent's Motion for Partial dismissal of Venetian Casino Resort L.L.C. Et Al.'s Appeal. | | 11-28860
|
| 12/02/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Respondent's Motion for Partial dismissal of Venetian Casino Resort LLC's Appeal. | | 02-20589
|
| 12/04/2002 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order Granting Motion. filed December 2, 2002. Appellants shall have until December 9, 2002, to file and serve their response to respondents' motion for partial dismissal. | | 02-20754
|
| 12/12/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Response due from appellants: 30 days from the date of this order. The briefing schedule in this appeal shall be suspended pending further order of this court. Respondents may file any reply within 10 days from the date that appellants' response is served. | | 02-21231
|
| 12/12/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Partial Dismissal. | | 02-21260
|
| 01/10/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion for Permission to File Document. Respondent's Motion for Permission to Reply to Appellants' Opposition to Respondents' Motion for Partial Dismissal. | | 03-00562
|
| 01/16/2003 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause. | | 03-00904
|
| 01/23/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause. | | 03-01218
|
| 02/21/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Second Extension of Time to Reply to Appellants' Response to Order to Show Cause. | | 03-02933
|
| 03/25/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Third Extension of Time to Reply to Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause. | | 03-05024
|
| 03/31/2003 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. fn1[Appellants' motion to remand the appeals in Docket Nos. 37054, 37546 and 37558 is denied as moot. Respondent TRM Corporation's motion for entry of case management orders in those appeals is denied as moot. Harris/Arizona Rebar, Inc.'s motions for extensions of time to file a reply in the appeal under Docket No. 39928 are denied as moot. Harris' motion to dismiss that appeal on the basis that appellants are not aggrieved – the secondary jurisdictional concern mentioned in our show cause order - - is likewise denied as moot. Finally, Harris' request for permission to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss is denied as moot.] In the three consolidated appeals, Docket Nos. 37054, 37546 and 37558, appellants have moved for a jurisdictional determination. In the fourth appeal, Docket No. 39928, appellants have responded to our jurisdictional order to show cause. We conclude that this court lacks jurisdiction over the consolidated appeals in Docket Nos. 37054, 37546 and 37558, and we, therefore, dismiss these appeals. In response to our show cause order, appellants concede that "NRCP 54(b) certification should not have been entered" and that "this appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction." We conclude that this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal in Docket No. 39928, and we, therefore, " . . . dismiss the appeal." NNP03-RR/WM/MG. No. 39928 (Nos. 37054/37546/37558 are consolidated). | | 03-05340
|
| 04/17/2003 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion for Leave of Court to File an Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Petition for Rehearing of the Court's March 31, 2003 Order Dismissing Appeals. No. 39928 and Nos. 37054/37546/37558 (consolidated). | | 03-06581
|
| 04/21/2003 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100 from Beckley Singleton--check no. 096575. | | |
| 04/21/2003 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for Rehearing. Mailed on: 04/18/03. | | 03-06811
|
| 05/02/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Denying Motion as Moot in Docket Nos. 37054, 37546 and 37558. On March 31, 2003, this court entered an order dismissing the four above-captioned appeals. On April 17, 2003, The Associated General Contractors ('AGC') filed a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief in support of a petition for rehearing of the order dismissing appeals. Because the caption on AGC's motion included Docket Nos. 37054, 37546, 37558 and 39928, the motion was filed in all four cases. On April 21, 2003, Harris filed its petition for rehearing. A review of the petition reveals, however, that Harris seeks rehearing only of 'that portion of the 'Order Dismissing Appeals' pertaining to Supreme Court Case No 39928.' Accordingly, we deny, as moot, AGC's motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief in Docket Nos. 37054, 37546 and 37558. The motion remains pending in Docket No. 39928. Nos. 37054/37546/37558 are consolidated. | | 03-07443
|
| 05/06/2003 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." fn1[NRAP 40(c). The motion filed by The Las Vegas Chapter of the Associated General Contractors for leave to file an amicus brief is denied.] NNP03-RR/WM/MG | | 03-07703
|
| 06/03/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 03-07870
|
| 06/03/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
| 06/25/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on June 6, 2003. | | 03-07870
|