judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

LEVY VS. WATTS

Case Information: 42156
Short Caption:LEVY VS. WATTSCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 38607 , 39585
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A361891
Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A378035
Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:10/21/2003 / Osko, EugeneSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:02/07/2006 at 1:30 PMOral Argument Location:Regional Justice Center
Submission Date:02/07/2006How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
10/09/2003Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Beckley Singleton--check no. 099475.
10/09/2003Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 03-16800
10/21/2003Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Eugene Osko. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
11/26/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Appellant shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, file and serve the docketing statement. Failure to comply timely may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. 03-19755
12/02/2003Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter (letter attached recommending sanctions.) 03-20003
12/15/2003Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 03-20786
12/19/2003MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Motion to Dismiss Appeal and for Imposition of Monetary Sanctions for failure to participate in good faith in settlement conference. 03-21144
12/29/2003MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition 03-21563
01/05/2004MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition. 04-00249
01/05/2004MotionFiled Motion for Permission to File Document. Motion for Leave to File Reply to "Opposition" and Supporting "Affidavits". 04-00250
03/12/2004Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Amended/Supplemental. 04-04729
03/18/2004Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order. Filed in district court on March 9, 2004. 04-05190
04/22/2004MotionFiled Motion. Motion to Expedite Consideration of Respondent's Previously Filed "Motion to Dismiss Appeal and for Imposition of Monetary Sanctions for Failure to Participate in Good Faith in Settlement Conference" and her Previously filed "Motion for Leave to File Reply to 'Opposition' and Supporting 'Affidavits'" 04-07469
05/03/2004MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition. 04-08079
05/20/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Order Reinstating Briefing, Denying Motions as Moot and Directing Appellant's Counsel to Show Cause why Sanctions Should not be Imposed. Pursuant to NRAP 16(g), the settlement judge has filed a report with this court indicating that the parties were unable to agree to a settlement. Accordingly, we reinstate the deadlines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of this order to request transcripts in compliance with NRAP 9(a), and 70 days from the date of this order to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). In his report, the settlement judge also 'strongly recommend[s] sanctions be imposed in this case on Attorney Daniel Polsenberg.' As cause for imposing sanctions, the settlement judge notes several instances in which Mr. Polsenberg failed to comply with the procedural rules of this court during the settlement conference process. In light of the settlement judge's report, Mr. Polsenberg shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, show cause why he should not be sanctioned for his conduct during the settlement conference process in this appeal. Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and requesting this court to impose sanctions against Mr. Polsenberg pursuant to the settlement judge's report. As cause for requesting dismissal of this appeal respondents note that appellant's original notice of appeal was premature as it was filed while appellant's motion under NRCP 59 was still pending in the district court. Appellant has filed an opposition to that motion. We note that on March 3, 2004, the district court entered an order resolving appellant's NRCP 59 motion and that on March 8, 2004, appellant filed an amended notice of appeal. Accordingly, it appears that the appeal may no longer be premature. Appellant filed the docketing statement on December 15, 2003. In that docketing statement appellant represents that 'the appeal appears to be premature.' Because the jurisdictional posture of this appeal appears to have changed since the filing of that docketing statement, we direct appellant to file an amended docketing statement within 15 days from the date of this order. This court will conduct a jurisdictional review of this matter upon the filing of the amended docketing statement. In light of the above, we deny respondents' motion to dismiss the appeal and for sanctions as moot. Additionally, we deny respondents' motion for leave to file a reply to appellant's opposition to the motion. Fn1 [The settlement statement was 12 days late and was 29 pages long.] Fn2 [Accordingly, we also deny as moot respondent's motion for an expedited decision on the motion to dismiss and for sanctions, as well as, the motion for leave to file a reply to appellant's opposition to the motion for expedited decision.] 04-09365
06/07/2004Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 04-10470
06/07/2004Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 04-10471
06/14/2004MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 04-10906
06/22/2004Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. filed June 14, 2004. The clerk shall file the Response to Order to Show Cause received on June 18, 2004. 04-11309
06/22/2004MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. 04-11165
08/02/2004MotionFiled Motion and Order Extending Time. Brief due: August 30, 2004. 04-14000
09/01/2004Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. from attorney Samuel A. Harding informing this court that he will oppose any motion for extension of time file the opening brief. 04-15896
09/03/2004MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 04-16123
09/03/2004Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. --Receipt of Copy. 04-16174
09/09/2004MotionFiled Motion. Request for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief of The Nevada State Medical Association and Clark County Medical Society. 04-16584
09/14/2004MotionFiled Response to Motion. Statement of Non-Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief. 04-16816
09/14/2004MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Increase in Amount of Supersedeas Bond. 04-16820
09/15/2004MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. for opposition to request to file amicus brief. 04-17001
09/15/2004Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. --Amended Certificate of Service. (Motion) 04-17004
09/15/2004Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. --Amended Certificate of Service. (Opposition) 04-17005
09/20/2004MotionFiled Response to Motion. Appellant, Adam Levy, M.D.'s Response to Motion for Increase in Amount of Supersedeas Bond. 04-17394
09/24/2004MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 04-17736
11/01/2004Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. regarding the transmission of the Answering Brief to the Supreme Court. 04-20014
11/03/2004MotionFiled Motion for Excess Pages. Motion for Leave to File Brief (Answering Brief) in Excess of 30 Pages. 04-20257
12/03/2004MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 04-22099
01/05/2005MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. (second request) 05-00280
01/21/2005MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for One Day Extension of Time. 05-01370
01/21/2005MotionFiled Motion for Excess Pages. 05-01372
04/21/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order. This court previously entered an order directing counsel for appellant, attorney Daniel L. Polsenberg, to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed in accordance with the recommendation of the settlement judge. After review of Mr. Polsenberg's response, we decline to impose sanctions. We grant appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief and appendix. The clerk shall file the opening brief and appendix received on September 7, 2004. Along with the opening brief and appendix, appellant also submitted 15 volumes of transcripts. We waive the requirements of NRAP 9(a), 10(b) and 30(b)(1) and direct the clerk of this court to file all 15 volumes of transcripts received on September 7, 2004. We grant respondents' unopposed motions for an extension of time to file the answering brief. The clerk shall file the 38-page answering brief and appendix received on November 3, 2004. We grant appellant's unopposed motions for extensions of time to file the reply brief. The clerk shall file the 53-page reply brief and appendix received on January 21, 2005. The Nevada State Medical Association and the Clark County Medical Society ('NSMA and CCMS') have filed a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief in support of appellant's position on appeal. NSMA and CCMS submitted a copy of a proposed brief along with their motion. On September 15, 2004, respondents filed a motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to that motion. The clerk shall file the opposition received on September 15, 2004. We grant the motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief. However, we conclude that the proposed amicus curiae brief does not comply with the procedural rules of this court. Although we grant the motion for leave to file an amicus brief, we direct the clerk of this court to return the proposed amicus brief received on September 9, 2004. NSMA and CCMS may file an amicus curiae brief within 20 days from the date of this order. Respondents may file an answering brief to the amicus curiae brief within 10 days of service of that brief. Respondents have filed a 'Motion for Increase in Amount of Supersedeas Bond.' Appellant has filed a response to that motion. No good cause appearing, we deny respondents' motion to increase the amount of the supersedeas bond. 05-07735
04/21/2005MotionFiled Response to Motion. Patricia Watts' Opposition to "Request for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief of the Nevada State Medical Association and Clark County Medical Society." 04-17002
04/21/2005TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: Friday, January 26, 2001; Tuesday, January 30, 2001; Wednesday, January 31, 2001; Thursday, February 1, 2001; Friday, February 2, 2001; Amended page 69, Friday, February 2, 2001;Tueday, February 6, 2001; Wednesday, February 7, 2001; Thursday, February 8, 2001; Friday, February 9, 2001; Tuesday, February 13, 2001; Wednesday, February 14, 2001; Thursday, February 15, 2001; Friday, February 16, 2001;August 27, 2001. Court Reporter: Kris Johnson. 04-16407
04/21/2005BriefFiled Opening Brief. 04-16238
04/21/2005AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. Volumes 1 through 4. 04-16239
04/21/2005BriefFiled Answering Brief. 04-20258
04/21/2005AppendixFiled Appendix to Answering Brief. 04-20259
04/21/2005BriefFiled Reply Brief. 05-01374
04/21/2005AppendixFiled Appendix to Reply Brief. Volumes 1 through 3. 05-01375
04/21/2005Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to attorney Weldon E. Havins. Returned unfiled, the original and five copies of the "Amici Curiae Brief in Support of Appellant from the Nevada State Medical Association and Clark County Medical Society, received on September 9, 2004."
05/13/2005BriefFiled Amicus Brief. Amicus Brief in Support of Appellant--Nevada State Medical Association & Clark County Medical Society 05-09399
05/23/2005MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Amicus Brief of Respondent. 05-10092
06/01/2005Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. filed May 23, 2005. Ms. Watts shall have until June 13, 2005, to file and serve her answering brief to the amici curiae brief. 05-10730
06/13/2005MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Leave to File Brief of the Nevada Trial Lawyers Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Position of Respondents. 05-11510
06/15/2005BriefFiled Answering Brief. Respondent's Brief in Response to "Amici Curiae Brief in Support of Appellant." 05-11749
06/27/2005MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion of Extension of Time in Which to Respond to NTLA's Motion for Leave to file an Amicus Brief. 05-12602
06/27/2005Other Other. Filed Response to "Motion for Leave to File Brief of the Nevada Trial Lawyers Association as Amicus Curiae" and Withdrawal of Motion for Extension. 05-12608
07/14/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order. The Nevada Trial Lawyers Association (NTLA) has moved for leave to file an amicus curiae brief in support of respondents' position. Appellant has filed a response. Appellant requests leave to file an answer to NTLA's amicus brief. Appellant also requests leave to submit a response to respondent Watts' answer to NSMA's amicus brief. fn1[Appellant also withdrew his previously filed motion for an extension of time to respond to NTLA's motion. Accordingly, we will take no action on the extension motion.] We grant NTLA's motion. The clerk shall file the amicus brief received on June 13, 2005. Appellant shall have 20 days from the date of this order to file and serve an answer to NTLA's amicus brief. We deny appellant's request for leave to file a response to the answer to NSMA's 'amici curiae brief.' 08/22/05 order: we vacate the portion of our order entered July 14th that permitted appellant to file an answer to the NTLA's brief.jcr 05-14116
07/14/2005BriefFiled Amicus Brief. Amicus Brief of the Nevada Trial Lawyers Association. 05-11512
08/05/2005MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Respond to the National Trial Lawyers Associatoins' Amicus Curiae Brief. 05-15587
08/19/2005MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Respond to the NTLA's Amicus Curiae Brief (Second Extension.) 05-16536
08/22/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. On July 14, 2005, this court entered an order allowing the NTLA to file an amicus brief and granting appellant's motion to file an answer to the NTLA's amicus brief. Appellant has now filed two requests to extend the time for filing his answer to the NTLA's amicus brief. We conclude that appellant has failed to establish good cause to extend the time to file an answer to the NTLA's amicus brief. Accordingly, we deny the motions and vacate the portion of our order entered July 14th that permitted appellant to file an answer to the NTLA's brief. 05-16560
08/22/2005Other Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, unfiled, Appellant's Response to the Amicus Curiae Brief of the Nevada Trial Lawyer's Association.
10/26/2005Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on December 13, 2005, at 11:00 a.m. (SNP06-WM/MG/JH)
11/07/2005MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion to continuing the time for Oral Argument which is presently scheduled for December 13, 2005. 05-21909
11/14/2005MotionFiled Response to Motion. Notice of non-opposition to a continuance of the oral argument. 05-22372
11/22/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order Vacating Argument and Rescheduling. We vacate the oral argument presently scheduled for December 13, 2005, at 11:00 a.m., and direct the clerk to schedule this appeal for oral argument before the Southern Nevada Panel on the next scheduled argument calendar in February 2006 for 30 minutes. 05-23066
12/09/2005Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Notice of Availability for Oral Argument. 05-24074
12/19/2005Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on February 7, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. (SNP06-WM/MG/JH)
01/23/2006Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
02/07/2006Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. To the Southern Nevada Panel. SNP06-WM/MG/JH
02/09/2006Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to Clark Co. Clerk requesting "Court's Instructions to the Jury" filed 2/21/01. 06-02987
02/10/2006ExhibitFiled Exhibits (copies). "Court's Instructions to the Jury" filed in district court on 2/21/01. 06-02991
02/17/2006MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Argument Limited to Three (3) Pages of Comment on the Jury Instruction Discussed in Oral Argument and Which is Among Those this Court has Since Requested from the District Court. 06-03625
02/21/2006MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Leave to Supplement Record with Certified Transcript of Oral Argument. 06-03722
02/21/2006TranscriptReceived Transcript. Transcript of Oral Argument held Tuesday, February 7, 2006. 06-03723
02/27/2006Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. Amended Certificate of Service. 06-04496
03/01/2006MotionFiled Response to Motion. Conditional Non-Opposition to Respondents' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Argument. 06-04659
03/14/2006Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Oral argument was heard in this appeal on February 7, 2006. Respondent Patricia Watts has moved to file a supplemental argument. The clerk shall file the supplemental brief received on February 21, 2006. Appellant shall have 5 days to file and serve a supplemental brief of no more than 3 pages, if appellant deems such a brief necessary. We grant the unopposed motion to file a transcript of the oral argument. The clerk shall file the transcript submitted on February 21, 2006. 06-05433
03/14/2006BriefFiled Supplemental Brief. Respondent's Supplemental Argument. 06-03721
03/14/2006TranscriptFiled Transcript. Transcript of Supreme Court Oral Argument held Tuesday, February 7, 2006. 06-03723
03/22/2006MotionFiled Motion for Excess Pages. Motion to Exceed Page Limit by One Page. 06-06124
03/22/2006Other Other. Received Appellant's Supplemental Argument. 06-06126
03/27/2006Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Filing Supplemental Argument. The clerk shall file the 4-page supplemental argument received on March 22, 2006. 06-06354
03/27/2006BriefFiled Supplemental Brief. Appellant's Supplemental Argument. 06-06126
05/17/2006Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." SNP06-WM/MG/JH 06-10322
06/06/2006Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $150 from Beckley Singleton - check no. 214696.
06/06/2006Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Rehearing. Appellant's Petition for Rehearing. 06-11830
09/28/2006Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Directing Answer and Transferring to En Banc Court. Respondents: Answer to Petition due 15 days. We transfer this matter to the en banc court for all further proceedings. 06-19873
10/12/2006MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. To file Answer to Petition for Rehearing. 06-20971
10/12/2006Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Respondents shall have until October 23, 2006, to file and serve an answer to the petition for rehearing. 06-21054
10/20/2006Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Answer to Petition for Rehearing. Respondent Patricia Watts' Answer to Appellant's Petition for Rehearing. 06-21656
12/14/2006Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. Order Granting Rehearing and Affirming. We grant rehearing to clarify our affirmation of our order of May 17, 2006. "We affirm the judgment of the district court." EN BANC. Rose, C.J., Gibbons, Douglas and Parraguirre, JJ. Maupin, J., with whom Becker, J., agrees, concurring. Hardesty, J., concurring. 06-25612
01/10/2007RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Exhibits: "Court's Instructions to the Jury" filed in district court on 2/21/01 returned this day. 07-00639
01/10/2007Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
01/19/2007RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on January 16, 2007. 07-00639
02/15/2007Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. from attorney William G. Cobb requesting publication of the decision in this case. 07-03837
04/25/2007Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Denying Request to Publish Decision. We conclue that publication is not warranted. 07-09288