| Case Information: 40136 | |||
| Short Caption: | REPUBLIC SILVER STATE DISPOSAL VS. DIST. CT. (KENNEDY) | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A415503 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Disposition Filed/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 08/30/2002 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Kummer Kaempfer Bonner & Renshaw--check no. 39406. | ||
| 08/30/2002 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. | 02-15115 | |
| 08/30/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Affidavit of the party beneficially interested or the affidavit of petitioner's attorney. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 09/05/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Notice of Filing Affidavit Pursuant to Notice of Procedural Deficiency. | 02-15329 | |
| 01/23/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. The real parties in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. | 03-01222 | |
| 02/21/2003 | Petition/Writ | Filed Answer to Petition for Writ. Answer of Paul Lynn Kennedy and Paul M. Gaudet. | 03-02947 | |
| 03/05/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Petitioners shall, within 20 days of this order's date, show cause why their writ petition should not be dismissed as moot. | 03-03710 | |
| 03/19/2003 | Motion | Filed Stipulation. Stipulation Granting Petition for Writ of Mandamus or, in the Alternative, Prohibition. | 03-04680 | |
| 03/31/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Because it appeared that the writ petition had become moot, we ordered petitioner, on March 5, 2003, to show cause why its writ petition should not be dismissed as moot. Instead of complying with this court's order, petitioner, together with the real parties, filed a stipulation to the entry of writ relief. The court will not decide moot issues. Petitioner shall, within 20 days of this order's date, show cause why this writ petition should not be dismissed as moot. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this petition or the imposition of sanctions, or both. | 03-05286 | |
| 04/10/2003 | Motion | Filed Stipulation/Dismiss Appeal. Stipulation for Dismissal of Petition for Writ of Mandamus or, in the Alternative, Prohibition. | 03-06047 | |
| 04/17/2003 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Petition. Dismissing Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. On April 10, 2003, petitioner and the real parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the writ petition as moot in light of the parties' pending "settlement of all issues in the case." We approve the stipulation and " . . . we dismiss this writ petition." The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. fn1[See NRAP 42(b).] NNP03-RR/WM/MG | 03-06530 | |
| 04/17/2003 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No notice in lieu of remittitur issued. | ||