| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 06/11/2002 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Lee T. Hotchkin, Attorney at Law--check no. 3998. | | |
| 06/11/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | | 02-10148
|
| 06/13/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Letter. to Washoe County Clerk regarding transmission of missing documents due to Deficient Notice of Appeal Packets in 39749 and 39751. In 39749 the "Judgment" appealed from and the "Notice of Entry of Judgment" and in 39751 the "Order of Preliminary Injunction" are missing. Due date: 10 days. 39749/39751 | | |
| 06/18/2002 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | | 02-10573
|
| 06/24/2002 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Hon. Mario G. Recanzone. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | | |
| 06/25/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed District Court Order/Judgment. Certified copy of order filed in district court on May 22, 2002. | | 02-10969
|
| 06/27/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. Hon. Mario G. Recanzone (district court order/judgment). | | |
| 07/15/2002 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Notice of District Court Order Denying Petitioner's Motion for Emergency Stay. | | 02-12086
|
| 07/16/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion for Stay. Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal.
07/29/02 ORDER: TRANSFERRED MOTION FOR STAY TO DOCKET NO. 39836. | | |
| 07/24/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal.
07/29/02 ORDER: TRANSFERRED OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR STAY TO DOCKET NO. 39836. | | |
| 07/25/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion to Consolidate. Motion for Real Parties in Interest to Consolidate the Writ of Mandamus into the Civil Appeal Settlement Proceedings and for an Extension of Time to File an Answer to the Writ of Mandamus. Nos. 39749 and 39836. | | 02-12774
|
| 07/29/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Order to Show Cause and Directing Transfer of Motion for Stay to Related Writ Petition. Docket No. 39749 is an appeal from a district court order holding appellant in contempt. Docket No. 39836 is a writ petition challenging the same contempt order. Our preliminary review of the documentation before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect in the appeal. Appellant shall have 30 days from the date of this order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The settlement conference in the appeal shall be suspended pending further order of this court. Respondent may file any reply within 10 days from the date that appellant's response is served. As it appears that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal, we decline to consider appellant's motion for stay in the appeal. We direct the clerk of this court to transfer the motion for stay, filed on July 16, 2002, and the response thereto, filed on July 24, 2002, to Docket No. 39836. The motion for stay shall be addressed in the context of the writ petition. Nos. 39749/39836-these cases are not consolidated. | | 02-12991
|
| 08/02/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Response to Motion of Real Parties in Interest to Consolidate the Writ of Mandamus into the Civil Appeal Settlement Proceedings and for an Extension of Time to File an Answer to the Writ of Mandamus. Nos. 39749 & 39836. | | 02-13249
|
| 08/06/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion for Permission to File Document. Motion for Permission to file a Reply to Respondents' Opposition. | | 02-13432
|
| 08/09/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion for Permission to File Document. Motion for Permission to File a Reply to Opposition of Real Parties in Interest. | | 02-13675
|
| 08/16/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Response to Order to Show Cause and Directing Transfer of Motion for Stay To Related Writ Petition. Nos. 39749 and 39836 (not consolidated). | | 02-14015
|
| 08/16/2002 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, with letter (pursuant to NRAP 27(a)), "Reply to Response to Motion to Consolidate into the Civil Appeal Settlement Proceedings." Nos. 39749 and 39836 | | |
| 08/21/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion for Permission to File Document. Motion for Permission to File a Reply to Opposition to Motion to Strike Opposition to Writ of Mandate, or, in the Alternative, Prohibition. Nos. 39749 and 39836 (not consolidated). | | 02-14324
|
| 09/10/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. Order Dismissing Appeal (No. 39749) and Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition (No. 39836). We conclude that this court lack jurisdiction over the appeal from the district court's contempt orders, and ' . . . we dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 39749.' fn5[We deny as moot the Capurros' July 25, 2002 motion insofar as it seeks to 'consolidat[e] the writ of mandamus into the civil appeal settlement proceedings.' But insofar as that motion seeks an extension of time to file an answer to the writ petition, we grant the motion. The August 2, 2002 request for submission is denied as moot. The August 6, 2002 motion to strike the answer as untimely is denied . The August 21, 2002 motion for leave to file a reply in support of the motion to strike is granted. The clerk of this court shall file the reply provisionally received by this court on August 21, 2002.] SNP03-MS/ML/NB. Nos. 39749/39836-cases are not consolidated. | | 02-15600
|
| 09/10/2002 | Motion | Filed Reply to Response. Reply to Opposition to Motion to Strike Opposition to Writ of Mandate, or, in the Alternative, Prohibition. Nos. 39749/39836-cases are not consolidated. | | 02-14329
|
| 10/08/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 02-15829
|
| 10/08/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
| 10/14/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on October 9, 2002. | | 02-15829
|