judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

GUADALUPE, INC. VS. DIST. CT. (MRI INT'L)

Case Information: 39734
Short Caption:GUADALUPE, INC. VS. DIST. CT. (MRI INT'L)Court:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A434708Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:06/23/2003 at 9:30 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:06/23/2003How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
06/06/2002Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
06/06/2002Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. 02-09908
06/06/2002Petition/WritFiled Affidavit in Support of Petition for Writ. Verification for Application for Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition. 02-09910
06/06/2002Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. -- Certificate of Mailing. 02-09911
06/06/2002Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
06/06/2002Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Copy of 5/3/02 order. Due Date: 10 days
06/13/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. The real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. 02-10308
06/14/2002Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Jeffrey J. Whitehead Ltd.--check no. 4352.
06/17/2002Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Notice of Filing - Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Disqualify Counsel filed in the district court on May 3, 2002. 02-10506
06/21/2002Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus/Prohibition. 02-10804
04/01/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On July 5, 2002, petitioners submitted a reply to real party in interest's answer to the petition for mandamus or prohibition. This court has not directed petitioners to file a reply. Additionally, petitioners have not sought permission to file the reply. Accordingly, the clerk of this court shall return, unfiled, the reply received on July 5, 2002. 03-05409
04/01/2003Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to attorney Jeffrey J. Whitehead. Returned unfiled, the Original "Response to Answer for Writ of Mandamus/Prohibition" received July 5, 2002.
05/02/2003Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes in Carson City on June 23, 2003, at 9:30 a.m. (En Banc)
06/09/2003Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
06/23/2003Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Before the En Banc Court.
11/03/2003Order/DispositionalFiled Order Granting Petition. Granting Petiton for Writ of Mandamus. "ORDER the petition GRANTED AND DIRECT THE CLERK OF THIS COURT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS instructing the district court to VACATE its order denying the motion to disqualify the law firm of Moran & Associates and to enter an order disqualifying the firm." Rose, J. and Becker, J. Leavitt, J., with whom Agosti, C.J., agrees, concurring. Shearing, J., with whom Maupin, Agrees, dissenting. Gibbons, J., dissenting. EN BANC. 03-18208
11/03/2003WritIssued Writ. Original and one copy of writ and copy of order mailed to Jeffrey J. Whitehead for service upon Judge Michael L. Douglas. 03-18239
11/24/2003WritFiled Writ. Served on Judge Douglas on November 10, 2003. 03-18239
12/02/2003RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 03-18591
12/02/2003Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.