search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 37771
Short Caption:POPE VS. MOTEL 6Court:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):White Pine Co. - Seventh Judicial District - CV9807134Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:10/03/2001How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
04/26/2001Filing Fee Filing Fee due. 08/06/01 order: no fee due--in forma pauperis.
04/26/2001Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 01-07005
05/14/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to appellant Juanita H. Pope in response to letter received on May 9, 2001.
07/17/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Order Directing Compliance with NRAP 24(a). Based on documentation submitted by appellant, it appears that she is seeking to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, without prepayment of fees and costs. fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] We direct the district court to enter an order in compliance with NRAP 24(a) within 30 days from the date of this order, and to provide a copy of the order to this court. 01-12128
07/26/2001Order/IncomingFiled District Court Order. Copy of Order to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed in district court on July 24, 2001. 01-12699
08/06/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Re: Filing Fee and Record on Appeal. On July 24, 2001, the district court granted appellant's request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis under NRAP 24(a). Accordingly, no filing fee is due. fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents regarding forma pauperis status received from appellant on May 1, May 21, and June 18, 2001.] Within 30 days from the date of this order, the clerk of the district court shall transmit to the clerk of this court the original trial record. fn4[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 01-13202
10/03/2001Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Copy. Vols. 1 through 5. 01-16676
10/03/2001Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
07/27/2004Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Notice of Pro Hac Vice Suspension for attorney Shawn Regan. 04-13701
08/13/2004Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Certificate of Reinstatement as Pro Hoc Vice pursuant to SCR 42(11). 04-14729
01/31/2005Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Directing Response. Respondent shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file a response, including authorities, addressing why the district court's order should not be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings. 05-01931
03/02/2005MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. Response of Respondent's Motel 6, et al., to the Court's January 31, 1005 order. 05-04096
06/23/2005Opinion/DispositionalFiled Authored Opinion. "Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded." Before Rose, Gibbons and Hardesty, JJ. Author: Hardesty, J. We concur: Rose and Gibbons, JJ. 121 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 31. SNP05 05-12335
07/19/2005RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 05-12878
07/19/2005Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
07/28/2005RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on July 22, 2005. 05-12878