| Case Information: 36138 | |||
| Short Caption: | MILLER (JOHN) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR98P1081 Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR98P1034 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 11/22/2000 | How Submitted: | On Briefs |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 05/17/2000 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 05/17/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Fast track appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.) | 00-08295 | |
| 05/18/2000 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Rough Draft Transcript(s). Transcripts requested: April 14, 2000. Court Reporter: Isolde Zihn. Filed in district court on: May 15, 2000. | 00-08297 | |
| 06/01/2000 | Transcript | Filed Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: 4/14/00. Court Reporter: Isolde Zihn. | 00-09222 | |
| 06/13/2000 | Appendix | Filed Joint Appendix. | 00-09983 | |
| 06/13/2000 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Statement. | 00-10039 | |
| 06/20/2000 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Response. | 00-10543 | |
| 09/13/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Full Briefing. We have determined that full briefing will assist the court in the disposition of this appeal. Opening brief and appendix due: 40 days. fn2[We suspend the requirement in NRAP 9 for counsel to file a certified transcript.] Answering brief and reply brief shall be filed in compliance with NRAP 31. | 00-16083 | |
| 10/10/2000 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 10/10/00 (Reno/Carson). | 00-17927 | |
| 10/10/2000 | Appendix | Filed Joint Appendix. | 00-17928 | |
| 11/13/2000 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: 11/9/00. | 00-19799 | |
| 11/22/2000 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 11/22/00 (Reno/Carson). | 00-20593 | |
| 11/22/2000 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 07/12/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. 'ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.' NNP01A-MS/DA/RR | 01-11802 | |
| 08/02/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On July 30, 2001, appellant John Ray Miller submitted a proper person "motion for extension of time to file a petition for rehearing of EN BANC reconsideration." Appellant is represented by counsel and has not been granted leave to file papers in proper person. Nevertheless, we have considered appellant's motion and we deny the requested relief. The remittitur is due to issue August 6, 2001. However, we order the issuance of the remittitur stayed to provide appellant's counsel an opportunity to file a petition for rehearing on appellant's behalf, 15 days from the date of this order. If appellant's counsel does not file a petition for rehearing within 15 days of the date of this order, the remittitur shall issue 20 days from the date of this order. Appellant shall proceed hereafter by and through counsel. | 01-13056 | |
| 08/23/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 01-14287 | |
| 08/23/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 09/04/2001 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 29, 2001. | 01-14287 | |
| 03/06/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On July 30, 2001, appellant John Ray Miller submitted a proper person motion for an extension of time to file a petition for en banc reconsideration. fn1[Although appellant requested an extension of time to file a petition for en banc reconsideration, because appellant had not yet filed a petition for rehearing, we construed appellant's request as a request for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing pursuant to NRAP 40.] Because appellant was represented by counsel, on August 2, 2001, we entered an order denying appellant's motion. In that order, we also stayed issuance of the remittitur until August 22, 2001, in order to provide appellant's counsel an opportunity to file a petition for rehearing with this court if counsel deemed such filing appropriate. On August 7, 2001, this court received a proper person letter requesting this court to reconsider the denial of his motion for an extension of time. We note that appellant has not been granted leave to file documents in proper person. Nevertheless, we elect to treat appellant's letter as a motion for reconsideration of our August 2, 2001, order and direct the clerk of this court to file the letter received on August 7, 2001. We note that a criminal appellant has no right to proceed in proper person on appeal. Accordingly, we deny appellant's motion for reconsideration. | 02-04047 | |
| 03/06/2002 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. Proper Person Letter in response to Order filed on 8/2/01. | 01-13346 | |