search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 36073
Short Caption:RUSSELL (RICK) VS. STATECourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR95P2586Classification:Criminal Appeal - Fast Track - Post-Conviction
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
05/08/2000Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
05/08/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Fast track appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.) 00-07482
05/18/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Fast Track. Appellant's petition was filed in th district court on May 21, 1996. This court has determined that this appeal shall proceed according to the provisions of Nevada Rule of Appellate Procedure 3C. Transcript request form due: 10 days. Fast track statement due: 40 days. Thereafter, this appeal shall proceed in accordance with the provisions of NRAP 3C. 00-08328
05/30/2000Transcript RequestFiled Request for Rough Draft Transcript(s). Transcripts requested: 3/22/00. Court Reporter: Sierra Nevada Reporters. Filed in district court on: 3/30/00. (MISSING 1/10/01) 00-09073
06/16/2000TranscriptFiled Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: March 22, 2000. Court Reporter: Eric V. Nelson. 00-10330
07/19/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-12505
08/01/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. The clerk of this court shall file the fast track statement and appendix provisionally submitted on July 17, 2000. 00-13320
08/01/2000Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Statement. 00-12298
08/01/2000AppendixFiled Joint Appendix. 00-12299
08/16/2000Fast Track BriefFiled Fast Track Response. 00-14326
10/30/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. " . . . we affirm the district court's order denying appellant's post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus." fn1[We note that in his petition below, appellant also argued that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to request a psychological evaluation to determine whether appellant was competent. Appellant failed to demonstrate that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.] SNP00A-CY/WM/NB 00-19025
11/28/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 00-19414
11/28/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
12/04/2000RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on November 30, 2000. 00-19414