judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

EUNICE LABOKE,ETAL V. JEFFREY M. FORD

Case Information: 98-CV-1774
Short Caption:EUNICE LABOKE,ETAL V. JEFFREY M. FORDClassification:Appeals - Civil - Landlord And Tenant
Lead: 98-CV-1582 Consolidated:98-CV-1774
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:LT14543-98Filed Date:11/18/1998

Opening Event Date:11/18/1998Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:02/11/1999
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantEunice Laboke Y
Jeffrey C. TuckfeltNY
AppellantEfren Laboke N
Jeffrey C. TuckfeltNY
AppelleeJeffrey M. Ford NPro SeN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/18/1998NOTICE OF APPEAL
12/15/1998APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS no oppo
12/15/1998RECEIVED - aplt's docketings statement
12/22/1998ORDERED that the motion of appellants to consolidate appeals is granted, and appeals nos. 98-CV-1582 and 98-CV-1774 are consolidated for all purposes herein. it is F/O that the motions of appellants for leave to file the lodged docketing statements are granted, and the lodged docketing statements are filed. It is F/O that the Clerk of the Superior Court shall prepare and transmit the record on apeal to this court without fee forthwith. A request for preparation of transcripts of proceedings in the Superior Court shall be made, on motion with notice, to the appropriate motions or trial judge, for determination in accordance with Gaskins v. United States, 265 A 2.d 589 *D.C. 1970 or McKelton v. Bruno, 264 A 2.d 493 (D.C. 1970) See D.C. App. R. 23(c). (BY: AMW)
12/29/1998APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to substitute parties and remand
01/11/1999RECORD ON APPEAL
01/19/1999ORDERED that the motion of appellants is granted, and Autrice Williams is hereby substituted for Jeffrey N. Ford, and this case is hereby remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with appellant's motion. Itis F/O that the caption of this appeal shall be entered on the docket as shown above. See D.C. App. R. 43 (c). (BY: AMW)
01/19/1999REMANDED
02/11/1999MANDATE ISSUED