judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

TONY R. JACKSON V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 99-CF-1320
Short Caption:TONY R. JACKSON V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Felony - Homicide
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:F338-98Filed Date:09/14/1999

Opening Event Date:09/14/1999Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:01/15/2003Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:12/05/2003
Argued/Submitted:04/13/2004
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:06/03/2004
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantTony R. Jackson Y
Robert S. BeckerYY
AppelleeUnited StatesN
John R. Fisher NN
Rikki D. McCoyYN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/14/1999NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by: David H. Reiter 412012 202 887-0418
10/28/1999APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Robert J. Dowlut, Esquire
11/08/1999APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT (RT Ordered)
11/12/1999RECORD ON APPEAL
03/02/2000SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (13-pgs/graybill 7/23/99 proc.)
03/02/2000RECORD COMPLETED
04/12/2000LETTER referring to counsel for appellant the letter received from appellant on April 10 and directing a response from counsel within 20 days. (JAC)
04/28/2000LETTER from counsel re the status of updating aplt re his appeal.
05/02/2000 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief_ of appellant_ shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief_ of appellee_ shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: GP)
06/06/2000APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo to 7/12/00
06/26/2000 On consideration of the unopposed motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the brief, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before July 12, 2000. (By: GP)
07/12/2000APPELLANT'S BRIEF
08/14/2000APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 8/14/00.
08/31/2000 On consideration of the motion of appellee_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellee_ shall be filed on or before September 13, 2000. (pir)
09/13/2000APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
09/13/2000APPELLEE'S BRIEF
09/14/2000TMC - Aple's motion to dismiss appeal - Aplt's opposition
09/27/2000RECEIVED - aplt's oppo aple's mot to dismiss
10/04/2000ORDERED, sua sponte, that the Clerk shall file the lodged opposition to aple's motion to dismiss.
10/04/2000APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to aple's motion to dismiss
10/04/2000ORDER GRANT APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL and this appeal is hereby dismissed. See McFadden v. United States, 614 A.2d 11, 12 n.2 (D.C. 1992); Taylor v. United States, 603 A.2d 451, 458-59 (D.C.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 852 (1992); Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989); M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312 (D.C. 1971). (by: TESCNM)
10/04/2000DISMISSED
10/12/2000CJA ATTORNEY'S QUALLS LETTER
10/27/2000MANDATE ISSUED
12/18/2000NOTICE OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
01/29/2001NOTICE OF DENIAL OF PET. FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
05/22/2001MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE Denied Without Prejudice
05/23/2001On consideration of the motion of pro se appellant to recall the mandate, it is ORDERED that appellee shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, file a response to appellant's motion to recall the mandate. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion to recall the mandate is hereby held in abeyance pending receipt of appellee's response.(TE,SC)
06/22/2001APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION - for extension of time to respond to motion to recall mandate to 7/24/01
06/26/2001On consideration of the motion of appellee for an extension of time to respond to pro se appellant's motion to recall mandate per this court's order of May 23, 2001, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and appellee shall file its response to the motion to recall mandate on or before July 24, 2001. (TE,SC)
07/17/2001APPELLEE'S REPLY - to aple's motion to recall the mandate
07/26/2001TMC - Aplt's motion to recall the mandate - Aple's opposition to motion to recall mandate
08/10/2001ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall transmit a copy of the notice of appeal to the Criminal Division of the Superior Court to be filed as a motion for extension of time pursuant to D.C. App. R. 4(b)(3). See McKnight v. United States, 764 A.2d 240 (D.C. 2000). *** MORE ***
08/10/2001ORD DENYING MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE without prejudice to appellant filing a motion to reinstate should the trial court grant his motion for extension of time. See D.C. App. R. 4(b)(1). F/O that if the Superior Court does grant relief under McKnight, Supra, Robert J. Dowlut, Esquire shall be reappointed to represent appellant and to seek reinstatement of this appeal. (by: TESCNM)
08/24/2001RECEIVED pro se letter from appellant regarding the court's denial of his motion to recall the mandate and re-appoint Robert Dowlut as counsel.
11/16/2001RECEIVED pro se letter from appellant regarding appointment of appellant counsel.
12/13/2001LETTER referring to Robert J. Dowlut, Esquire, the Nov. 16 pro se letter from appellant and the 8/23 and 9/25 Superior Court orders. (JAC)
12/19/2001COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS Denied as Moot
02/01/2002RECEIVED pro se letter Jan. 26, 2002 requesting information regarding appt of cnsl
02/08/2002LETTER to appellant in response to his letter received on Feb. 1 regarding appointment of counsel. (JAC)
02/12/2002ORD DNY COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASON as moot. (by: WAGNER)
02/22/2002RECEIVED ltr from aplt in regards to CJA Counsel
03/04/2002ORDERED that the Clerk shall transmit a copy of appellant's letter and attachments, to be construed as a motion for leave to late the notice of appeal, along with a copy of this court's October 4, 2000 and August 10, 2001, orders to the trial court for the trial court to reconsider appellant's motion in light of this court's holding in Williams v. United States, 783 A.2d 598 (D.C. 2001)(en banc). F/O that the trial court shall transmit to this court a copy of any order entered in this matter. (BY: AMW)
05/24/2002APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL
06/14/2002ORDERED, sua sponte, that the mandate issued by this court on October 27, 2000, in appeal no. 99-CF-1320, is hereby recalled. F/O that the motion of appellant to reinstate appeal is granted, and appeal no. 99-CF-1320, is hereby reinstated. F/O, sua sponte, that Robert S. Becker, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in appeal no. 99-CF-1320. F/O that counsel for appellant shall file a supplemental brief, within 30 days from the date of this order. F/O that appeal no. 02-CO-559 is hereby dimissed as duplicative of appeal no. 99-CF-1320. (BY: AMW)
06/14/2002APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Robert S. Becker, Esquire
07/09/2002APLT MOTION TO EXT TIME TO FILE SUPLEMENTAL BRIEF no oppo to 30 days w/ copy of a motion for appeal transcripts
08/08/2002SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (Rpt.Trans.-9/25/98 Proc.- 8 Pgs.-Rpt. L. Pavlish)
08/21/2002SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD # 3 (55 pgs--Hunt) 2/4/98 proc.
09/04/2002SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD # 4 (18 pgs--taped) 11/16/98 proc.
09/23/2002 On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the supplemental brief, wherein appellant indicates that transcript is being prepared, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the supplemental brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date the transcript is filed with this court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant_ shall advise this court within 15 days thereof of appellant's_ receipt of the ordered transcript. (GP)
10/03/2002SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD # 5 (13 pgs--Shelton) 3/12/99 proc.
12/11/2002SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD # 6 (5 pgs--Hogue) 7/10/98 proc.
01/15/2003SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #7 (4pgs/Tape) 3/26/99 proc.
01/15/2003RECORD COMPLETED
01/22/2003 It appearing that the record on appeal in this case has been supplemented and is now complete, it is ORDERED that the supplemental brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the supplemental brief of appellee, if any, shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (GP)
03/03/2003APLT MOTION TO EXT TIME TO FILE SUPLEMENTAL BRIEF to 7/1/03. no oppo
03/10/2003 On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the supplemental brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellant_ is granted, and the supplemental brief of appellant_ shall be filed with this court on or before July 1, 2003. (GP)
07/02/2003APLT MOTION TO EXT TIME TO FILE SUPLEMENTAL BRIEF to 9/30/03. no oppo
07/09/2003 On consideration of the unopposed motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file his supplemental record, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the supplemental brief of appellant shall be filed on or before September 30, 2003. Any further requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP)
09/30/2003APLT MOTION TO EXT TIME TO FILE SUPLEMENTAL BRIEF until October 30, 2003 (no oppo)
10/15/2003 On consideration of the unopposed motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the supplemental brief, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellant_ is granted, and the supplemental brief of appellant_ shall be filed with this court on or before October 30, 2003. No further requests for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of good cause. Failure to comply with this order shall result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (AMW)
10/30/2003APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM
12/05/2003BRIEFS COMPLETED
12/05/2003APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM
12/22/2003APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF to 1/9/04. no oppo
12/23/2003 On consideration of the unopposed motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the reply brief, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellant is granted, and the reply brief of appellant shall be filed with this court on or before January 9, 2004. (GP)
01/08/2004APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
01/22/2004FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
03/05/2004CALENDAR NOTICE SENT
03/15/2004APPELLANT'S MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT
03/17/2004LETTER TO COUNSEL GRANTING REQUEST TO ARGUE
04/13/2004FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
04/13/2004ARGUED (FA,WH,NE) Robert S. Becker, Esq., for appellant. Rikki D. McCoy, Esq., for appellee.
05/12/2004AFFIRMED moj (FA,WS,NB)
05/18/2004CJA ATTORNEY'S QUALLS LETTER
06/03/2004MANDATE ISSUED
06/04/2004APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC (received for filing without leave to file out of time)(Served by DCCA)
09/14/2004ORD DENY APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC (pro se petition) (WATESCFARZRDGLWHNE)
10/27/2004MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE Denied
11/02/2004ORD DENYING MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE (FA, WH, NE)