Events |
Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
06/20/1971 | | error | |
09/13/1999 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by: Jeff Orchard 202 333-6173 439-582 | |
10/25/1999 | | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
10/25/1999 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
12/06/1999 | | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS numbers 99-SP-924 & 99-SP-1316 for all purposes herein. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Jeff Orchard, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statements for both appeals. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: AMW) | |
12/06/1999 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Jeffrey Orchard, Esquire | |
02/01/2000 | | ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement and brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file these documents out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file these documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (BY: GPJ) | |
02/28/2000 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS no oppo | |
02/28/2000 | | RECEIVED - aplt's docketing statement | |
03/17/2000 | | ORDER: Grant motion of appellant for leave to file the docketing statement, and the lodged docketing statement is hereby filed. FO that counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (By: GP) | |
03/17/2000 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
04/25/2000 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (BY:AMW) | |
06/06/2000 | | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS | |
08/31/2000 | | ORD GRT COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASON and the appointment of Jeffrey Francis Orchard, Esquire, is hereby vacated, and Steven H. Schiff, Esquire is appointed to represent appellant herein. Jeffrey Francis Orchard, Esquire, shall transmit all documents pertaining to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. F/O that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (BY AMW) | |
08/31/2000 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Steven H. Schiff, Esquire | |
10/10/2000 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo 60 days | |
10/25/2000 | | On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before December 11, 2000. (by GP) | |
12/11/2000 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until all documents are recvd from prior counsel. no oppo | |
03/07/2001 | | On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 30 days from counsel's receipt of the missing materials from former counsel. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the former counsel shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, comply with this court's order of August 31, 2000. Failure to comply with order may result in the issuance of an order directing attorney Jeffrey Francis Orchard to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for failure to comply with the orders of this court, and may result in the referral to Bar Counsel. (By: AMW) | |
03/28/2001 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE no oppo | |
03/28/2001 | | RECEIVED - response to court's ord of 8/31/01. | |
04/11/2001 | | ORDERED: Grant the motion of former counsel, and the lodged response is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that current counsel shall file the brief of appellant within 40 days from the date of this order. (By: GP) | |
04/11/2001 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE | |
05/29/2001 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo for 30 days | |
06/04/2001 | | On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before June 20, 2001. (By: GP) | |
06/20/2001 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF no oppo 10 days | |
07/02/2001 | | RECEIVED - aplt's brief | |
07/12/2001 | | On consideration of the motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and no opposition having been filed, and the lodged brief, it is ORDERED that the motion of appellant is granted, and the lodged brief is filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee_ shall be filed with this court on or before August 6, 2001. (By: GP) | |
07/12/2001 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
08/06/2001 | | NOTICE by D.C. that it takes no position on the merits of this appeal. | |
08/06/2001 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
08/30/2001 | | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |
12/05/2001 | | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |
01/24/2002 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
01/24/2002 | | SUBMITTED (TE,WH,KN) | |
01/28/2002 | | Upon consideratin of appellant's appeals from the trial court's denial of his habeas corpus challenges to decisions of the United States Parole Commission's denying parole, and the notice of the District of Columbia that it takes no position on the merits of these appeals, and it appearing that the records of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons indicate that appellant was released from custody in January 2001, it is ORDERED that the United States is invited to respond to appellant's appeals within 20 days from the date of this order. (TEWHKN) | |
02/19/2002 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL as moot aplt's appeal of the denial of his writ of habeas corpus | |
02/21/2002 | | ORDERED that the motion of appellee, the United States, is granted, and appeals nos. 99-SP-924 and 99-SP-1316 are hereby dismissed as moot. (TEWHKN) | |
02/21/2002 | | DISMISSED | |
03/15/2002 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
04/30/2002 | | RECEIVED - aplt's motion to dismiss cases closed 2/21/02 sent motion back | |