judyrecords
search tips
720 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

MID VALLEY ENTERPRISES VS. TON C/W 52860

Case Information: 53478
Short Caption:MID VALLEY ENTERPRISES VS. TON C/W 52860Court:Supreme Court
Consolidated: 52860 *, 53478Related Case(s): 52860
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A539815Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:03/27/2009 / Trost, JanetSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:03/03/2010How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
03/26/2009Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Brownstein firm - check no. 40048.
03/26/2009Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice Re Settlement Conference Program and Suspension of Rules mailed to all counsel. (The requesting of transcripts and briefing are stayed pursuant to NRAP 16(a)(1). Docketing Statement Form mailed to counsel for appellant(s).) 09-07643
03/26/2009Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to File Case Appeal Statement. Due Date: 10 days. 09-07646
03/27/2009Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Janet Trost 09-07679
04/06/2009Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 09-08535
04/07/2009Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Case Appeal Statement. 09-08680
04/13/2009Settlement Program ReportFiled ECAR/Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is appropriate for mediation and a settlement conference is scheduled for 4/8/09 09-09291
04/13/2009Settlement Program ReportFiled Final Report/No Settlement. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 09-09292
06/30/2009Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. and Consolidating Appeals. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement. Ton & Mid Valley: 15 days to request transcripts; Ton: 90 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Mid Valley: 30 days from opening brief to file combined answering brief in 52860 and opening brief in 53478. Ton: 30 days from Mid Valley's combined brief to file combined reply brief in 52860 and answering brief in 53478. Mid Valley: 30 days from service of Ton's combined brief to file reply brief in 53478. 52860/53478
09/25/2009BriefFiled Opening Brief. Nos. 52860/53478. (09-23510)
09/25/2009AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. Volume A. Nos. 52860/53478. (09-23522)
09/25/2009AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. Volume B. Nos. 52860/53478. (09-23533)
10/26/2009MotionFiled Motion and Order Extending Time. Brief due: Brief due: November 30, 2009. Nos. 52860/53478 (09-26089). (Respondent Mid Valley Combined Answering Brief and Opening Brief).
11/30/2009BriefFiled Answering Brief. Respondent Mid Valley Combined Answering Brief and Opening Brief. Nos. 52860/53478 (09-28990).
12/01/2009AppendixFiled Appendix to Answering Brief. Respondent/Appellant's Supplemental Appendix. Nos. 52860/53478 (09-29031).
12/29/2009BriefFiled Reply Brief. Appellant/Respondents Combined Reply/Answering Brief. Nos. 52860/53478. (09-31946)
01/28/2010BriefFiled Reply Brief. Respondent/Appellant's Reply Brief. Nos. 52860/53478 (10-02518).
01/28/2010Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Deficient Brief. Certificate of Compliance to Respondent/Appellant's Reply Brief due: 10 days. Nos. 52860/53478 (10-02519).
02/02/2010Notice/IncomingFiled Certificate of Compliance. Respondent/Cross-Appellant's Reply Brief filed on 01/28/10. Nos. 52860/53478 (10-02791).
03/03/2010Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Submit on Briefs. Oral argument will not be scheduled in these consolidated appeals, and they shall stand submitted on the record and the briefs filed herein, as of the date of this order. Nos. 52860/53478 (10-05563).
03/03/2010Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Nos. 52860/53478.
05/12/2010Order/DispositionalFiled Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding. 'We affirm the district court's post-judgment order denying Mid Valley Enterprises, LLC's motion for attorney fees in Docket No. 53478. We affirm in part and reverse in part the district court's summary judgment, and we remand this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order. In light of this conclusion, we disagree with Sheri's Ranch that Ton's lawsuit was frivolous, and therefore we affirm the district court's order denying attorney fees in Docket No. 53478.' SNP10-JH/MD/KP. Nos. 52860/53478. 10-12315
06/08/2010RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 10-12958
06/08/2010Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
06/15/2010RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by District Court Clerk on June 11, 2010. 10-12958