| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 09/27/1995 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 10/06/1995 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
| 10/06/1995 | | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE | |
| 10/06/1995 | | DESIGNATION OF RECORD | |
| 10/06/1995 | | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) | |
| 10/20/1995 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY of writ of attachment and/or mot. for approval of supersedeas bond | |
| 10/20/1995 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 10/20/1995 | | EMERGENCY CONTESTED MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND PURSUANT TO RULE 62-I OF THE DISTRIC OF COLUMBIA COURT RULES. (filed by: Patricia Thornton) | |
| 10/20/1995 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 10/20/1995 | | APPELLANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY OF WRIT OF ATTACHMENT AND/OR MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND | |
| 10/20/1995 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 10/23/1995 | | TMC - Aplt's emergency motion for stay of writ of attachment and/or motion for apporval of supersedeas bond - Aplt's emergency contested motion for approval of supersedeas bond pursuant to rule 62-I | |
| 10/25/1995 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to the appellant's motion for stay of writ of attachment and/or motion for approval of supersedeas bond. | |
| 10/25/1995 | | error | |
| 10/25/1995 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY - and supplement to (Emergency) motion for stay of writ of attachment and/or motion for approval of supersedeas bond | |
| 10/26/1995 | | ORDER GRANTING APLT'S MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL, and the judgment entered on March 10, 1995, and the writ of attachment are hereby stayed until further order of this court. (by: FERDMK) | |
| 10/26/1995 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND, and appellant shall post with the Superior Court a supersedeas bond in the amount of $130,000.00. (by: FERDMK) | |
| 10/26/1995 | | ORDER that the stay pending appeal is conditioned upon and will be effective following appellant's filing of a supersedeas bond in the amount of $130,000.00. F/O that appellant shall, within five (5) days of the date of this order, advise this court whether bond has been posted. (by: FERDMK) | |
| 10/27/1995 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE -to 10/26/95 order | |
| 01/11/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for extension of time to transmit the record to 60 days from January 1, 1996. | |
| 01/11/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mamp | |
| 02/15/1996 | | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
| 02/15/1996 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (One white box of exhibits) | |
| 02/15/1996 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 05/02/1996 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to transmit the record to the extent indicated herein. FO that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked uponw ith disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By JAC) | |
| 06/11/1996 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
| 06/18/1996 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |
| 06/18/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 06/25/1996 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION - to aple's motion to dismiss appeal | |
| 07/08/1996 | | APPELLEE'S REPLY to aplt's oppo to aple's mot. to dismiss | |
| 07/19/1996 | | RECEIVED - oppo to the aplt's leave to file response to the late reply filed by aple (no record of mot. for leave) | |
| 07/23/1996 | | RECEIVED appellant's motion for leave to file response to the accusations contaied in the late reply filed by appellee. (Needs the response for the motion) | |
| 07/24/1996 | | RECEIVED appellant's response to the late reply filed by appellee | |
| 07/24/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE to the accusations contained in the late reply filed by appellee | |
| 07/24/1996 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |
| 07/26/1996 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION - to the aplt's 7/23/96 motionfor leave to file response to the accusations contained in the late reply filed the aple | |
| 07/31/1996 | | TMC - Motion to dismiss appeal on the grounds that an arbitration judgment may not be appealed - opposition to motion to dismiss appeal by aplt. - Reply to the aplt's opposition to the aple's motion to dismiss on the grounds that an arbitration judgement may not be appealed - Opposition to the aplt's leave to file response to the accusations contained in the late reply filed by aple. - Opposition to the appellant's July 23, 1996 motion for leave to file response to the accusations contained in the late reply filed by the aple. - Motion for leave to file response to the accusations contained in the late reply filed by aple | |
| 10/09/1996 | | ORD GRT APLT MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE and the Clerk shall file the lodged reply. (by: RDNMBE) | |
| 10/09/1996 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY to the accusations contained in the late reply filed by appellee. | |
| 10/09/1996 | | ORDER DENY APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL F/O that appellee shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, file her brief. (by: RDNMBE) | |
| 11/08/1996 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
| 11/08/1996 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 11/19/1996 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
| 11/19/1996 | | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
| 12/02/1996 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
| 12/03/1996 | | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
| 02/27/1997 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 02/27/1997 | | ARGUED (FE,ST,KG) Patricia M. Thornton, Esquire, for appellant. Norman L. Blumenfeld, Esquire, for appellee. | |
| 03/27/1997 | | REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion | |
| 04/18/1997 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |