Parties and Attorneys
Grosz v. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration et al.
Division 1
Division 1
Case Number B309418
| Party | Attorney |
|---|---|
| Stanley E. Grosz : Plaintiff and Appellant | Robert K. Friedl Capstone Law APC 1875 Century Park East, Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90067-2533 Mardiros Hagop Dakessian Dakessian Law, LTD. 445 S. Figueroa St. Suite 2210 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Ryan Hung-Hsi Wu Capstone Law, APC 1875 Century Park East Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Steven Michael Rauser Dakessian Law Ltd. 445 S Figueroa St Ste 2210 Los Angeles, CA 90071-1667 Tyler Curtis Anderson Capstone Law APC 1875 Century Park East #1000 Los Angeles, CA 90067 |
| California Department of Tax and Fee Administration : Defendant and Respondent | Douglas Jose Beteta Attorney General's Office 300 S Spring St., Suite 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013-1230 |
| Nicolas Maduros : Defendant and Respondent | Douglas Jose Beteta Attorney General's Office 300 S Spring St., Suite 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013-1230 |
| Amazon.com, Inc., et al. : Real Party in Interest and Respondent | Joseph Alan Reiter Hueston & Hennigan LLP 523 W 6th Street Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90014 |
Case Summary
Trial Court Case:
19STCV27757
Court of Appeal Case:
B309418
Division:
1
Case Caption:
Grosz v. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration et al.
Case Type:
CV
Filing Date:
12/09/2020
Completion Date:
Oral Argument Date/Time:
09/21/2022 09:00 AM
Docket (Register of Actions)
Grosz v. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration et al.
Division 1
Division 1
Case Number B309418
| Date | Description | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 12/17/2020 | Notice of appeal lodged/received. | Notice of appeal filed 12/9/2020 by Stanley E. Grosz. |
| 12/17/2020 | Filing fee. | check# D3799335 for $775.00 (One Legal) |
| 12/31/2020 | Civil case information statement filed. | Plaintiff and Appellant: Stanley E. Grosz Attorney: Robert K. Friedl |
| 03/17/2021 | Notice per rule 8.124 - with reporter's transcript. | Notice dated Dec. 17, 2020 |
| 08/13/2021 | Reporter's transcript filed. | R-1 |
| 08/19/2021 | Stipulation of extension of time filed to: | re Appellant's Opening Brief only |
| 10/06/2021 | Stipulation of extension of time filed to: | |
| 11/22/2021 | Request for judicial notice filed. | by appellant Grosz. |
| 11/22/2021 | Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. | Plaintiff and Appellant: Stanley E. Grosz Attorney: Ryan Hung-Hsi Wu ** 2 volumes of appendix ** |
| 12/02/2021 | Stipulation of extension of time filed to: | This stipulation applies to all respondents. |
| 12/07/2021 | Opposition filed. | to motion for judicial note. |
| 12/13/2021 | Reply filed to: | opposition to motion for judicial notice. |
| 12/14/2021 | Ruling on request for judicial notice deferred. | |
| 01/28/2022 | Errata filed to: | Appellant filed his Reply to Opposition to Motion for Judicial Notice on December 13, 2021. Upon reviewing the file, Counsel for Appellant has discovered that Exhibit A to that document was inadvertently omitted from the filing. A true and correct copy of Exhibit A, as it should have been attached, is attached hereto as Exhibit A. |
| 02/02/2022 | Request for judicial notice filed. | by appellant Stanley E. Grosz. |
| 02/14/2022 | Requested - extension of time | |
| 02/14/2022 | Requested - extension of time | |
| 02/16/2022 | Opposition filed. | to second motion for judicial notice. |
| 02/17/2022 | Granted - extension of time. | |
| 02/17/2022 | Granted - extension of time. | |
| 02/22/2022 | *** Motion/Request Deferred *** | Appellant's Second Motion for Judicial Notice, filed February 22, 2022; and Respondents' opposition thereto, filed February 16, 2022, are deferred to panel for ruling. |
| 03/24/2022 | Respondent's brief. | Defendant and Respondent: California Department of Tax and Fee Administration Attorney: Douglas Jose Beteta Defendant and Respondent: Nicolas Maduros Attorney: Douglas Jose Beteta |
| 03/24/2022 | Respondent's appendix & brief filed. | Real Party in Interest and Respondent: Amazon.com, Inc., et al. Attorney: Joseph Alan Reiter ** 1 volume of appendix ** |
| 03/25/2022 | Requested - extension of time | |
| 03/25/2022 | Granted - extension of time. | |
| 05/05/2022 | Requested - extension of time | |
| 05/05/2022 | Granted - extension of time. | |
| 06/10/2022 | Appellant's reply brief. | Plaintiff and Appellant: Stanley E. Grosz Attorney: Mardiros Hagop Dakessian |
| 06/10/2022 | Case fully briefed. | |
| 07/15/2022 | Letter sent to: | counsel. The above-named case is fully briefed and a calendar notice advising the parties of the date and time scheduled for oral argument will be sent approximately 20 days prior to the hearing date. Please be advised that the court could set this matter for oral argument within the next few months. At this time counsel are directed to indicate whether oral argument is requested or waived and if requesting argument by which method you will appear. You must complete this form and return it with proof of service on all interested parties within 7 days from the date shown above. |
| 07/18/2022 | Response filed: | Mardiros H. Dakessian, counsel for appellant, requesting in person argument. |
| 07/20/2022 | Response filed: | Douglas J. Beteta, counsel for respondent, requesting in person argument. |
| 07/20/2022 | Response filed: | Joseph Alan Reiter, counself for RPI, requesting in person argument. |
| 07/22/2022 | Calendar notice sent. Calendar date: | August 12, 2022 at 9:00 a.m.IN PERSON. |
| 07/26/2022 | Filed document entitled: | Stipulation and request for continuance of oral argument by appellant's counsel. |
| 07/26/2022 | Request for oral argument filed by: | Douglas Beteta for respondent CA Department. [15 minutes] |
| 07/28/2022 | Grant request to continue oral argument. | The oral argument in this matter is continued to September 21, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. |
Briefs
Grosz v. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration et al.
Division 1
Division 1
Case Number B309418
| Brief | Due Date | Date Filed | Party and Attorney | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civil case information statement filed. | 12/31/2020 | Plaintiff and Appellant: Stanley E. Grosz Attorney: Robert K. Friedl | | |
| Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. | 11/22/2021 | Plaintiff and Appellant: Stanley E. Grosz Attorney: Ryan Hung-Hsi Wu | ** 2 volumes of appendix ** | |
| Respondent's brief. | 03/24/2022 | Defendant and Respondent: California Department of Tax and Fee Administration Attorney: Douglas Jose Beteta Defendant and Respondent: Nicolas Maduros Attorney: Douglas Jose Beteta | | |
| Respondent's appendix & brief filed. | 03/24/2022 | Real Party in Interest and Respondent: Amazon.com, Inc., et al. Attorney: Joseph Alan Reiter | ** 1 volume of appendix ** | |
| Appellant's reply brief. | 06/10/2022 | Plaintiff and Appellant: Stanley E. Grosz Attorney: Mardiros Hagop Dakessian | |
Future Scheduled Actions
Grosz v. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration et al.
Division 1
Division 1
Case Number B309418
No information found.
Disposition
Grosz v. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration et al.
Division 1
Division 1
Case Number B309418
No information found.
Trial Court
Grosz v. California Department of Tax and Fee Administration et al.
Division 1
Division 1
Case Number B309418
Trial Court Name:
Los Angeles County Superior Court
County:
Los Angeles
Trial Court Case Number:
19STCV27757
Trial Court Judge:
Lu, Elaine
Trial Court Judgment Date:
10/20/2020