Case Information: 36288 | |||
Short Caption: | PULLUM (VIRGINIA) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C127819 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Life - Direct |
Disqualifications: | Maupin | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
Submission Date: | 11/09/2001 | How Submitted: | On Briefs |
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
06/15/2000 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
06/15/2000 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Maupin. Sat in district court proceedings. | ||
06/15/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Fast track appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.) | 00-10226 | |
06/15/2000 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Rough Draft Transcript(s). Transcripts requested: March 6, 2000, March 7, 2000, March 8, 2000 and May 4, 2000. Court Reporters: Patsy Smith and Renee Silvaggio. Filed in district court on: June 9, 2000. | 00-10227 | |
06/23/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. within which to File Rough Draft Transcripts. | 00-10759 | |
07/07/2000 | Transcript | Filed Transcript. Proceedings: May 4, 2000. Court Reporter: Renee Silvaggio. | 00-11619 | |
07/12/2000 | Transcript | Filed Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: 03/06/00; 03/07/00; and 03/08/00. Court Reporter: Patsy Smith. | 00-12012 | |
07/18/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On June 23, 2000, counsel for appellant filed a motion for an extension of time to file the rough draft transcripts and fast track statement. On July 7, 2000 and July 12, 2000, the transcripts were filed. The motion for an extension of time to file the transcripts is denied, as moot. The motion for an extension of time to file the fast track statement is granted. The fast track statement shall be filed on or before August 4, 2000. | 00-12404 | |
08/07/2000 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Statement. | 00-13671 | |
08/07/2000 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Fast Track Statement. | 00-13672 | |
08/21/2000 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Response. | 00-14659 | |
08/28/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Full Briefing. We have determined that full briefing will assist the court in the disposition of this appeal. Opening brief and appendix due: 40 days. fn2[We suspend the requirement in NRAP9 for counsel to file a certified transcript.] Answering brief and reply brief shall be filed in compliance with NRAP 31. | 00-15001 | |
10/10/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion and Order Extending Time. Brief due: October 13, 2000. | 00-17843 | |
02/08/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. | 01-02641 | |
03/22/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. The clerk of this court shall file the opening brief received on February 8, 2001. We admonish appellant's counsel for her dereliction in communicating with this court. The clerk shall file the answering brief received March 8, 2001. Appellant shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file a reply brief, if any. Failure to file a timely reply brief may be treated as an election not to file a reply brief. | 01-05057 | |
03/22/2001 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Mailed on: 2/6/01. | 01-02643 | |
03/22/2001 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: Express-No postmark. | 01-04283 | |
04/25/2001 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. Mailed on: 04/23/01. | 01-06966 | |
09/21/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice of Appearance. Gloria Navarro has joined the office of the Special Public Defender and will remain appellate counsel in this matter. | 01-16017 | |
11/09/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Submit on Briefs. Cause appearing, oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision to the Southern Nevada Panel as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. | 01-18714 | |
11/09/2001 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. To the Southern Nevada Panel. SNP02-CY/DA/ML | ||
12/05/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. We conclude that the prosecutor in this case did not overstep the bounds of permissible argument when he commented on her presence in the courtroom during the earlier testimony of other witnesses. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." SNP02-CY/DA/ML | 01-20304 | |
01/02/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 01-20401 | |
01/02/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
01/18/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on Janaury 7, 2002. | 01-20401 |