| Case Information: 92-AA-0166 | |||
| Short Caption: | VIRGINIA L. MAJOR V. D.C. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Bd Of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | Filed Date: | 02/20/1992 | |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 02/20/1992 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 03/17/1992 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | 11/09/1992 | ||
| Argued/Submitted: | 09/16/1993 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 10/18/1993 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Appellant | Virginia L. Major | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Appellant | Annie B. White | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Appellant | Dorothy M. Weaver | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Appellee | William Lockridge | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Appellee | District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment | N |
| ||||||
| Appellee | Marion Cieplax | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 02/20/1992 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
| 02/20/1992 | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE | |||
| 02/20/1992 | PETITIONER'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |||
| 02/21/1992 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD & Charles L. Reischel. | |||
| 03/17/1992 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
| 03/17/1992 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 03/26/1992 | The brief of petitioner shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of respondent shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By JEP) | |||
| 05/15/1992 | The brief of petitioner shall be filed within 10 days from the date of this order or this appeal maybe dismissed. (By JAC) | |||
| 05/22/1992 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF | |||
| 09/25/1992 | ORDER: Respondent shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, file the brief accompanied with a motion for leave to file the brief our of time, setting forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in this case being scheduled for consideration on the record on appeal and petitioner's brief alone. (By WHN) | |||
| 10/08/1992 | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO VACATE THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. | |||
| 10/22/1992 | RECEIVED memorandum in lieu of brief | |||
| 11/09/1992 | ORDER - ORDERED that the lodged memorandum in lieu of brief of appellee is filed. FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of respondents to vacate the briefing schedule is denied as moot, and this appeal shall be scheduled before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (By RO) | |||
| 11/09/1992 | MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF BRIEF OF APPELLEE - Filed | |||
| 11/09/1992 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
| 06/11/1993 | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |||
| 09/16/1993 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 09/16/1993 | SUBMITTED (RO,FE,SU) | |||
| 09/24/1993 | AFFIRMED MOJ (RO, FE, SU) | |||
| 10/18/1993 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||