DCX, INC., ET AL V. D.C. TAXICAB COMMISSION

Case Information: 92-AA-0089
Short Caption:	DCX, INC., ET AL V. D.C. TAXICAB COMMISSION	Classification:	Agency - Administrative Agency - Taxicab Commission
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:		Filed Date:	01/31/1992
Opening Event Date:	01/31/1992	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:		Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:	04/08/1992

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
01/31/1992		PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION WITH ATTACHMENTS
01/31/1992		PETITION FOR REVIEW
02/03/1992		PETITION FOR REVIEW
02/03/1992		CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD AND CHARLES REISCHEL
02/11/1992		RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION to application for stay pending appeal.
02/18/1992		TMC Stay; Summary Reversal
02/21/1992		RECEIVED response of respondent to motion for summary reversal.
03/03/1992		PETITIONERS' SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY REVERSAL
03/09/1992		ORDER Case is remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with respondent agency's response to the motion for summary reversal. Petitioners motion for stay is denied as moot. Petitioners motion for summary reversal is denied as moot.
03/09/1992		REMANDED
04/08/1992		MANDATE ISSUED
05/05/1992		RECEIVED petitioner's supplemental memorandum in support of motion for implementation of mandate, for vacation of agency order & for assessment of attorney fees.
06/18/1992		MEMORANDUM PETITIONER'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF MANDATE AND VACATION OF AGENCY ORDER
08/07/1992		VOTE SHEET - Motion for implementation and enforcement of mandate, for vacation of agency action, and for assessment of attorney's fees and costs.
08/18/1992		ORDER Respondent agency shall, within 10 days, file a response to petitioners' motion for implementation and enforcement of mandate, for vacation of agency action, an for assessment of attorney's fees and costs.
08/28/1992		RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for extension of time to file respond 3 working days
09/02/1992		RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION BY THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO MOTION TO IMPLEMENT AND ENFORCE MANDATE AND FOR OTHER RELIEF.
09/10/1992		PETITIONER'S REPLY to response of respondent to motion to motion to implement and enforce mandate and for other relief
09/17/1992		VOTE SHEET
10/08/1992		PETITIONER'S REPLY to filings of respondent.
10/16/1992		VOTE SHEET - Respondent's notice of filing - Petitioner's reply - 9/17/92 Vote Sheet
10/29/1992		ORDER that petitioners' motion for implementation and enforcement of the mandate is denied as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for attorney's fees is denied. (by: FESTGL)