Case Information: 44102 | |||
Short Caption: | VAN GELDER VS. UNITED RENTALS | Court: | Supreme Court |
Lower Court Case(s): | Carson City - First Judicial District - 0301705A | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | 10/27/2004 / Chubb, Janet | SP Status: | Completed |
Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
10/19/2004 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Hale Lane Peek Dennison & Howard--check no. 065419. | ||
10/19/2004 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 04-19318 | |
10/27/2004 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Janet L. Chubb. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
11/03/2004 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 04-20278 | |
12/10/2004 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued. Nos. 44101/44102-cases are not consolidated. | 04-22604 | |
12/21/2004 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. | 04-23264 | |
02/22/2005 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Order Removing From Settlement Program/Briefing Reinstated. and re: Bankruptcy Stay. The settlement judge has filed a report indicating that appellant has filed a 'Chapter 13 case in bankruptcy, which stays all proceedings.' Bankruptcy counsel for appellant also filed a copy of a 'Notice of Bankruptcy,' with this court. Accordingly, we remove these related appeals from the settlement conference program. Briefing and the requesting of transcripts remain suspended, however, in light of the automatic bankruptcy stay. Because these appeals remain on this court's active docket, counsel for appellant shall file status reports within 60 days from the date of this order informing this court of the status of the bankruptcy proceedings and specifically stating whether these appeals are stayed. If counsel reports that these appeals may proceed, counsel shall attach to the report any relevant orders or filings from the bankruptcy proceeding. Nos. 44101 and 44102/not consolidated. | 05-03429 | |
03/31/2005 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Status Report. Notice of Dismissal of Bankruptcy Action. Nos. 44101/44102 - not consolidated. | 05-09479 | |
04/05/2005 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. of Withdrawal of Counsel filed in the district court on 4/1/05. Hale Lane law firm withdraws as counsel for appellant. Nos. 44101/44102 - not consolidated. | 05-09480 | |
04/15/2005 | Motion | Filed Motion. Substittution and Withdraw of Attorney. Ian Van Gelder hereby consents to the withdrawal of Hale, Lane, Peek, Dennison and Howard hereby substitutes himself in pro per in the place and stead of such law firm. | 05-07422 | |
07/15/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Allowing Appeals to Proceed. On February 22, 2005, this court ordered these appeals stayed pursuant to the mandatory provisions of federal bankruptcy law. On March 31, 2005, respondent filed a 'Notice of Dismissal of Bankruptcy Action.' Based on respondent's filing, it appears that the automatic stay imposed on these appeals has ended. Cause appearing, these appeals shall proceed. Appellant's counsel, Jeremy J. Nork, has filed documents indicating that he is withdrawing as counsel of record in this matter and that appellant will be proceeding in proper person. Accordingly, the clerk shall remove Mr. Nork as counsel of record for appellant in this matter. Appellant shall have 60 days from the date of this order to retain new counsel and cause new counsel to file a notice of appearance with this court. If appellant does not intend to retain new counsel, he shall so notify this court within the same time period. Failure to retain new counsel will result in these appeals proceeding as proper person appeals. Nos. 44101/44102 – cases are not consolidated. | 05-14202 | |
07/29/2005 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Notice of Bankruptcy in Response to Order Allowing Appeals to Proceed. Nos. 44101/44102-cases are not consolidated. | 05-15085 | |
08/01/2005 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Notice of Re-Filing of Bankruptcy Action. Nos. 44101/44102 - not consolidated. | 05-15266 | |
11/29/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Imposing Bankruptcy Stay. We again order these appeals stayed pursuant to the mandatory provisions of federal bankruptcy law. Bankruptcy status report from attorney William Cope due: 90 days. Nos. 44101/44102 - cases are not consolidated. | 05-23450 | |
12/07/2005 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Status Report. Status Report pursuant to Order Imposing Bankruptcy Stay. | 05-23964 | |
12/09/2005 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. for status report. | 05-24078 | |
12/22/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement. Order Allowing Appeals to Proceed and Assigning Appeals to Proper Person Pilot Program. Based on appellant's bankruptcy discharge, it appears that the bankruptcy stay on these appeals has now been terminated. These appeals shall proceed. If either party or Mr. Cope believes that the automatic bankruptcy stay of these appeals remains in effect they shall so inform this court within 15 days from the date of this order. We conclude that appellant will be proceeding in proper person. We have decided to include this appeal in the pilot program. Appellant must file the appeal statement in compliance with the instructions contained therein. If these appeals are now moot, he shall so inform this court. No response required unless ordered by this court. (Pilot program civil appeal statement mailed to proper person appellant.) Nos. 44101 / 44102 – cases are not consolidated. | 05-24963 | |
05/11/2006 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Show Cause why Appeals should not be Dismissed as Abandoned. These are two unconsolidated appeals. Appellant shall have 30 days to show cause why these appeals should not be dismissed as abandoned. Failure to respond to this court's order may result in the dismissal of these appeals. Nos. 44101/44102 - cases are not consolidated. | 06-09900 | |
07/14/2006 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER these appeals DISMISSED." Nos. 44101/44102 - not consolidated. SNP06-WM/MG/JH. | 06-14626 | |
08/08/2006 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 06-16287 | |
08/08/2006 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
08/17/2006 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 9, 2006. | 06-16287 |