| Case Information: 44122 | |||
| Short Caption: | ELLIS (RANDY) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR041703 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Fast Track - Direct |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Disposition Filed/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 10/21/2004 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 10/21/2004 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Fast track appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.) | 04-19520 | |
| 10/21/2004 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Rough Draft Transcript(s). Transcripts requested: September 17, 2004. Court Reporter: Joan Dotson. Filed in district court on: not file-stamped. | 04-19521 | |
| 11/09/2004 | Transcript | Filed Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: 09/17/04 and 09/28/04. Court Reporter: Joan Marie Dotson. | 04-20669 | |
| 11/24/2004 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Fast Track Statement and Appendix due: December 7, 2004. | 04-21541 | |
| 01/04/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. To date, no fast track statement has been filed. Appellant's counsel Michael V. Roth shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file and serve the fast track statement and appendix or show cause why counsel should not be sanctioned. | 05-00128 | |
| 01/04/2005 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from attorney Michael V. Roth stating no further action will be successful in this appeal. | 05-00168 | |
| 01/12/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On January 4, 2005, this court received a letter from appellant's counsel Michael V. Roth. In the letter Roth informs this court that he has written to appellant and informed appellant that Roth will be taking no further action in this appeal. We remind counsel that the proper way to request action from this court is by motion pursuant to NRAP 27. Nonetheless, this court construes counsel's letter as a motion to withdraw this appeal voluntarily. We prefer that a stipulation or motion for such dismissal be accompanied by the affidavit of appellant or appellant's counsel indicating that counsel has explained to appellant the legal effects and consequences of a dismissal of the appeal and that appellant knowingly and voluntarily consents to a dismissal of the appeal. Roth shall have 20 days from the date of this order within which either to supplement the motion to dismiss this appeal with an affidavit containing the above-described assertions, or to file and serve the fast track statement and appendix. | 05-00637 | |
| 02/07/2005 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal. | 05-02447 | |
| 02/28/2005 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Voluntary Dismissal. On February 7, 2005, counsel for appellant filed a motion to withdraw this appeal voluntarily. Appellant consents to a voluntary dismissal of this appeal. Cause appearing, the motion is granted and we 'ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." fn1[Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.] NNP05-WM/MD/RP | 05-03889 | |
| 02/28/2005 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No remittitur issued. | ||