Case Information: 10-CV-1020 | |||
Short Caption: | TYRRELL L. EILAND V. SIDNEY RIBEAU, ET AL | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CAB625-10 | Filed Date: | 08/16/2010 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 08/16/2010 | Case Status: | Closed |
Record Completed: | 09/07/2010 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
Briefs Completed: | |||
Argued/Submitted: | |||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 03/07/2011 | ||
Costs Waived |
Party Information | ||||||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
Appellant | Tyrrell L. Eiland | Y | Pro Se | N | ||||||||
Appellee | Sidney Ribeau | N |
| |||||||||
Appellee | James H. Johnson | N |
| |||||||||
Appellee | Howard University | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
08/16/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
08/26/2010 | On consideration of the notice of appeal filed in this case on August 16, 2010, and it appearing that appellant was found eligible for cost-waived status in the trial court, and it further appearing that no transcript is needed forthis appeal, it is ORDERED that a briefing order will be issued upon the filing in this court, by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of the record index and record copies in accordance with D.C. App. R. 11 (b)(3)(A). (JAC) elp | |||
09/07/2010 | RECORD INDEX | |||
09/07/2010 | RECORD COPIES | |||
09/07/2010 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
09/17/2010 | It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that appellant's brief and the limited appendix including the documents required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and appellees' brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (JAC) elp | |||
11/01/2010 | On consideration of this court's order of September 17, 2010, directing appellant to file the brief and the limited appendix, as required by D.C. App. R. 30 (f), within 40 days and it appearing that the brief and the limited appendix have not been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief of appellant and the limited appendix shall be submitted within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the documents or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. (JAC) elp | |||
12/01/2010 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF (titled as motion for extension) | |||
12/01/2010 | RECEIVED - aplt's brief no appendix | |||
12/08/2010 | APPEARANCE- of Marshall W. Taylor on behalf of aples | |||
12/08/2010 | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION-to aplt's motion to extend time to file brief | |||
01/03/2011 | On consideration of appellant's motion for leave to file the lodged brief, the opposition thereto, and it appearing that the limited appendix was due to be filed with this court on or before December 13, 2010, but the limited appendix has not been filed, see D.C. App. R. 30, 31, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and the Clerk shall file the lodged brief of appellant. It is (MORE) | |||
01/03/2011 | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |||
01/03/2011 | FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of order, submit the limited appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the appendix or request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 13. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date the appendix is filed with this court. (ETW) elp | |||
02/09/2011 | On consideration of this court's order of January 3, 2011, directing appellant to submit the appendix, accompanied by a motion for leave to file out of time, and it appearing that appellant has failed to comply with the order, it is ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 13. (ETW) elp | |||
02/09/2011 | DISMISSED | |||
03/07/2011 | MANDATE ISSUED |