| Case Information: 91-CV-0756 | |||
| Short Caption: | JOAN T. BUFORD V. TALLEY R. HOLMES, JR. | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
| Lead: | 91-CV-0735 | Consolidated: | 91-CV-0756 |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CA3016-87 | Filed Date: | 07/10/1991 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 07/10/1991 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 10/30/1991 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | 05/01/1992 | ||
| Argued/Submitted: | 12/09/1992 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 06/25/1993 | ||
| Party Information | ||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
| Appellant | Joan T. Buford | N |
| |||||||||
| Appellee | Talley R. Holmes, Jr. | N |
| |||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 01/01/1901 | BUFORD JOAN T. ET AL HOLMES JR., TALLEY R. ET AL | |||
| 01/01/1903 | NOTE - 01 CONS. 91-735 NOTE - 01 NOTE - 02 2/21/92 ORD: DENIED APLE-X- NOTE - 02 APLT'S MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION NOTE - 03 FOR SUMM REV, F/O DENIED APLT- NOTE - 03 X-APLE'S MOTION FOR SUMM REV, NOTE - 04 F/O DENIED APLT-X-APLE'S MO NOTE - 04 FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS, F/O NOTE - 05 APLT'S BRIEF DUE IN 40 DAYS, NOTE - 05 APLE'S BRIEF 30 DAYS LATER. | |||
| 07/10/1991 | DESIGNATION OF RECORD AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/10/1991 | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/10/1991 | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/10/1991 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 07/15/1991 | COPY OF SUPERIOR COURT LETTER TO APPELLANT'S COUNSEL RE RECORD PICK-UP RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/17/1991 | RECORD ON APPEAL SEE 91-735. PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/30/1991 | ORDER APPEAL NOS. 91-735 AND 91-756 ARE CONSOLIDATED. AD PANELRO SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 08/21/1991 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (104 PGS/TREMEL) 4/30/91 PROC. DTE. PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 08/22/1991 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (9 PGS. -- BURNS) (5/7/91 PROCEEDINGS) RJG PANEL SCDATE 091191 SCHPRD RT | |||
| 08/27/1991 | ORDER SUA SPONTE ORD THAT APPEAL 91- 794 IS DISMISSED AS DUP OF NO. 91-756. EVH PANELTE SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 09/13/1991 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL APPELLEE'S RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 09/13/1991 | MOTION(S) FEE PAID FOR MSRV RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 09/19/1991 | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF CRT RPTR WATKINS FOR EXT OF TM TO FL TRIAL PROC. TO 10/10/91. PR PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 09/26/1991 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE APLE-x-APLT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL, ETC. RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/17/1991 | ORDER DENY CT RPTR WATKINS MOTION AS UNTIMELY FILED. PR PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/18/1991 | RECEIVED SUPPLEMENTAL MEMO IN SUPP. OF HOLMES MOTION FOR SUMMARY REV. RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/22/1991 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (588 PGS. - WATKINS) (4/29/91 - 5/3/91 PROC.) PR PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/30/1991 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (14 PGS. -- MOORE) (5/6/91 PROCEEDINGS) RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/30/1991 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 02/21/1992 | ORDER (SEE NOTES 2 THRU 5) JB PANELSCFAPR SCDATE 020392 SCHPRD VS | |||
| 05/01/1992 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
| 05/22/1992 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (106-pgs/burns 4/30/90) | |||
| 06/04/1992 | ERROR | |||
| 12/09/1992 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 12/09/1992 | ARGUED ST KG GA George H. Windsor, Esq. for appellant; Susan L. Brachshaw, Esq. for appellee. | |||
| 12/14/1992 | STATEMENT of aplt post argument supplement for the court | |||
| 01/06/1993 | MEMORANDUM Transmitting to division pleading from counsel for appellant | |||
| 06/03/1993 | AFFIRMED (ST,KG,GA) MOJ | |||
| 06/10/1993 | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR COSTS & ATTORNEY FEES cross-appellant | |||
| 06/25/1993 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||
| 06/30/1993 | TMC - Request for Costs | |||
| 08/23/1993 | ORDER GRANT APPELLEE MO FOR COSTS & ATTORNEY FEES in the amount of $204.75. (by: STKGGA) | |||
| 08/23/1993 | ORDER that the motion of appellees/cross-appellants fro the cost of the notice of appeal and transcript of proceedings in the Superior Court is denied without prejudice to the filing of an appropriate motion in the Superior Court. See D.C. App. R. 39. (by: STKGGA) | |||