| Case Information: 92-BG-0388 | |||
| Short Caption: | IN RE: DOUGLAS L. PIERSON | Classification: | Bar Governance - Bar - Disciplinary |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | Filed Date: | 04/01/1992 | |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 04/01/1992 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | 05/06/1993 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | |||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Petitioner | Bar Counsel | N |
| ||||||
| Petitioner | Board on Professional Responsibility | N |
| ||||||
| Respondent | Douglas L. Pierson | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 04/01/1992 | DISCIPLINARY LETTER From Bar Counsel transmitting certified copy of order from Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board suspending respondent. | |||
| 04/08/1992 | ORDER Suspending respondent; respondent to show cause before BPR w/i 30 days why identical discipline should not be imposed; BPR to recommend promptly thereafter to this court whether reciprocal disc shd be imposed or whether the Bd elects to proceed de novo. (RO) | |||
| 12/11/1992 | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law in D.C. effective 4/8/92; and that the Court notify respondent in the disbarment order that he may not apply for reinstatement until five years after the filing of the affidavit required by Rule XI, Section 14. | |||
| 12/16/1992 | LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel supporting the recommendation filed by the Board on Professional REsponsibility of November 20, 1992. | |||
| 01/27/1993 | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |||
| 05/06/1993 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 05/06/1993 | SUBMITTED (Fe,ST,KG) | |||
| 05/24/1993 | DISBARMENT (Opinion) | |||
| 05/24/1993 | DISBARMENT | |||
| 12/14/1994 | NOTICE RECEIVED from the Office of Bar Counsel advising the Court that respondent has failed to file affidavit required by DC App. R. XI, SS14(f). | |||