IN RE: JOEL STEINBERG

Case Information: 92-BG-0874
Short Caption:	IN RE: JOEL STEINBERG	Classification:	Bar Governance - Bar - Disciplinary
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:		Filed Date:	07/21/1992
Opening Event Date:	07/21/1992	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:		Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:	02/03/1994
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
07/21/1992		DISCIPLINARY LETTER From Bar Counsel transmitting certified copy of order of Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board imposing public reprimand.
07/24/1992		ORDER Respondent to show cause before BPR in 30 days why identical discipline shouldn't be imposed in DC; f/o BPR to recommend promptly whether reciprocal discipline should be imposed or whether Board will proceed de novo; f/o clerk to send copy of this order & order of VA State Bar to respondent and Chair of BPR. (By RO)
09/28/1993		REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. (Recommends against the imposition of reciprocal discipline).
10/05/1993		LETTER from the Office of Bar Counsel supporting the recommendation filed by the BPR dated 9/28/93.
11/08/1993		FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
02/03/1994	Filed	ACTION - Argued / Submitted
02/03/1994		SUBMITTED (FE,ST,PR)
02/04/1994		DISMISSED On consideration of the unanimous report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, supported by Bar Cousel, that no reciprocal discipline be imposed in this case because the misconduct that formed the basis of the Virginia public reprimand does not constitute misconduct in the District of Columbia. D.C. Bar R. XI, Sec. 11 (c) (5), it is ORDERED that this proceeding be dismissed. PER CURIAM (FE, ST, PY)