judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

MAURICE S. YOUNG V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 91-CO-1087
Short Caption:MAURICE S. YOUNG V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Other - Den. Of Post-Conviction Relief
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:F7418-81Filed Date:09/03/1991

Opening Event Date:09/03/1991Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/04/1992Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:01/05/2000
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantMaurice S. Young Y
Jonathan E. Rubens NN
AppelleeUnited StatesN
John R. Fisher NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/01/1901YOUNG, MAURICE S. UNITED STATES
01/01/1902FOR RT
01/01/1903NOTE - 01 11/07/91 ORD: APLT MOS LV TO NOTE - 01 PROCEED ON APPEAL IFP & FOR NOTE - 02 APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ARE NOTE - 02 GRNTD & ALAKE JOHNSON-FORD NOTE - 03 ESQUIRE IS APPOINTED TO NOTE - 03 REPRESENT APLT HEREIN. F/O NOTE - 04 APLT TO FL DOCKTG STMT W/IN NOTE - 04 10 DYS FRM DT OF THIS ORDER.
09/03/1991NOTICE OF APPEAL
09/27/1991LETTER REQUESTING APLT TO FILE FORM 5 AFFIDAVIT & REQUEST FOR APPT. OF COUNSEL GG PANELJC SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
10/07/1991APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE TO 9/27/91 ORDER (FORM 5) AJ PANEL SCDATE 102891 SCHPRD ANSA
11/05/1991RECORD ON APPEAL PR PANEL SCDATE 110491 SCHPRD R
11/07/1991APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) ALAKE JOHNSON-FORD, ESQ. PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
11/07/1991ORDER SEE NOTE FIELDS 01 - 04 GR PANELJWR SCDATE 101691 SCHPRD GR
11/19/1991APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT AJ PANEL SCDATE 111891 SCHPRD DSA
02/12/1992SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (21-PGS/TAPED 1/26/83) AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
03/04/1992SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (15 PGS. - QUINONES) (7/19/82 PROC.) PR PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD
03/04/1992RECORD COMPLETED
08/13/1992ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By JAP)
09/16/1992APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until such time as the missing transcript is recvd. and the record on appeal is actually completed.
10/19/1992ORDER Granted appellant's motion to vacate briefing order and the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days after RT is complete. Appellant shall file a statement within 30 as to the status of the pending transcript.
10/30/1992SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD (Order re: Motion to retain appellant at Lorton).
11/17/1992STATEMENT of transcript preparation.
07/29/1993ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court within 15 days from the date of this order as to the status of the aforementioned transcript ordered for the purpose of this appeal. (BY WHN)
08/13/1993STATEMENT of aplt re status of transcripts
03/31/1994ORDER - ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, advise this court as to the status of the transcript ordered for the purpose of this appeal and file any appropriate motion. (By WHN)
04/15/1994STATEMENT filed by appellant counsel - status of transcript preparation.
10/27/1997ORDER: The brief of appellant_ shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee_ shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: GP)
01/08/1998ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (By: GPJ)
01/26/1998APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to refile motion to stay briefing pending production of transcript no oppo
03/17/1998ORDER DENYING APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTIONwithout prejudice to appellant making the necessart arrangments, including a motion to the trial court, if necessary, to have the transcript ordered. (BY: AMW)sw
05/12/1998ORDERED, sua sponte, that the appointment of Alake Johnson-Ford, Esquire, is hereby vacated, and David E. Jones, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. Alake Johnson-Ford, Esquire, shall transmit all documents pertaining to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. It is ( M O R E )
05/12/1998ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed wit hin 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days th ereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: AMW)
05/12/1998APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) David E. Jones, Esq.
05/20/1998COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS Denied as Moot
05/28/1998ORDERED that the motion of Alake Johnson-Ford, Esquire, is denied as moot. (By: AMW)
06/23/1998APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION seccessor appointed appellant's counsel's motion for sanctions v.s previously appointed counsel.
06/23/1998APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file motion for extension of time late no oppo
06/23/1998RECEIVED - aplt's motion for extension of time to file brief
07/24/1998ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to late file his motion for an extension of time to file his brief is granted, and the Clerk shall file the lodged motion for extension of time. It is ( MORE)
07/24/1998APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF
07/24/1998ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF. It is ( MORE)
07/24/1998F/ORDERED that this court's May 12, 1998, order is hereby vacated to the extent that it directed briefing, and this court wil enter a briefing order after the outstanding transcripts are filed. It is( MORE )
07/24/1998F/ORDERED that counsel's request for sanctions against former counsel is granted to the extent that this matter is hereby referred to Bar Counsel. (By:(ST, SC & MA)
08/18/1998APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to withdraw aplt's counsel and proceed pro se mot for ext of time to file mot for summary rev
08/19/1998COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS Granted
08/28/1998ORD GRT COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASON and the appointment of David E. Jones, Esquire, is hereby vacated, and Jonathan E. Rubens, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. David E.Jones, Esquire, shall transmit all documents pertaining to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. (By: AMW)
08/28/1998APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Jonathan E. Rubens, Esq.
09/02/1998LETTER referring to newly-appointed counsel the August 18 pro se motion filed by appellant. (JAC)
04/26/1999 It appearing that the complete record on appeal has been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that the brief(s) of appellant(s) shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief(s) of appellee(s) shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: GP)
06/07/1999APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to July 19, 1999.
06/18/1999 On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and there appearing to be no opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before July 19, 1999____. (GP_)
07/16/1999APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF/stay of the briefing schedule pending receipt of missing portions of the record. (vvd)
08/02/1999SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #4 (Motion to Vacate Con- viction and Sentence Filed 1/8/91)
08/06/1999ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, advise this court whether additional record and transcript are needed for this appeal. (BY: JAC for GPJ)
08/25/1999APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF/statement in response to this court's 8/6/99 order. (vvd)
09/15/1999 On consideration of the motion of appellant_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, and there appearing to be no opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before October 4, 1999. No further requests for extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of good cause. Failure to comply with this order shall result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (By: AMW)
10/04/1999COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS) (vvd) Granted
10/18/1999In the Above case, your court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw from this appeal. If you wish, you may file a response to your attorney's motion by the date set forth in the attached order. In your response, you should set out your reasons why your attorney should not be permitted to withdraw. You may also set forth any grounds for appeal you believe you may have. In the event you need additional time within which to respond, you must advise the court in writing using the self addressed stamped envelope provided. After your response has been received or the time for filing has expired, the motion and any response you may make will be submitted to the court for its consideration. The court will also review the record of the trial proceedings including the court reporter's transcript. If the court concludes the appeal lacks merit and grants the motion of your court-appointed counsel to withdraw, the appeal may be dismissed. Therefore, it is important that you file a response to the motion if your believe there are grounds for appeal. (By: GP)
10/18/1999ORDER: Appellant shall file by November 30, 1999, any response showing cause why counsel's motion should not be granted, the appeal dismissed, and the judgment from which the appeal was taken affirmed. Failure to respond shall result in the motion being submitted for decision on the motion and record alone. (by: WAGNER)
12/06/1999TMC - Motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant (ANDERS)
12/10/1999JUDGMENT GRANT COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS) It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal be, and hereby is, affirmed. See Anders V. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). (by: SCRDWS)
12/10/1999AFFIRMED
01/05/2000MANDATE ISSUED