judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

KENNETH L. WRAY V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 92-CF-0099
Short Caption:KENNETH L. WRAY V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Felony - Other Felony
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:F6400-91Filed Date:01/28/1992

Opening Event Date:01/28/1992Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:06/23/1992Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:06/02/1993
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:09/06/1994

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantKenneth L. Wray N
Peter L. GoldmanYY
AppelleeUnited StatesN
John R. Fisher NN
Odessa P. Jackson YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/28/1992NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/18/1992RECORD ON APPEAL
03/23/1992APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Peter L. Goldman, Esq.
03/24/1992SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (22 pgs/whalin) proc. 1/28/92
03/27/1992APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
03/31/1992crt rptr's MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION of crtrptr johnson for ext. of tm to fl tr of trial proc
04/03/1992SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (178 pgs/schoch) proc. 11/15/91
04/28/1992ORD GRT CRT REPORTER JOHNSON FOR EXT OF TM TO FL trial proc. to 6/10/92.
06/23/1992SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (824-pgs/tanner 11/18-22/91)
06/23/1992RECORD COMPLETED
06/23/1992RECORD COMPLETED
08/07/1992ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By JAC)
08/12/1992APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 30 days
08/26/1992ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEFto October 13, 1992.
10/07/1992ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS nos. 92-CF-99, 92-CF-133 & 92-CF-250; the brief of appellant in 92-CF-99 shall remaind due to be filed on or before October 13, 1992 and the briefs of appellants in nos. 92-CF-133 & 92-CF-250 shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order. (By RO)
10/08/1992APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until 10 days after missing transcripts are received.
10/22/1992ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEFin 92-CF-99 to 40 days after complete transcript is filed with this court.(WHN)
11/19/1992APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 30 days
11/23/1992APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to December 18, 1992
12/22/1992APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until 1/17/93.
01/13/1993ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the brief of appellants in nos. 92-CF-133 and 92-CF-250 shall be filed on or before January 17, 1993. Any further request for extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By RO)
01/25/1993APPELLANT'S BRIEF (Kenneth L. Wray)
01/27/1993APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (30 days) (LAMARK SIMMONS)
02/22/1993APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF
02/22/1993RECEIVED appellant brief.
03/02/1993ORDER: Appellant in no. 92-CF-250 shall, within 15days from the date of order, file the brief accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time, setting forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to do so may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (By RO)
03/02/1993ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION IN NO. 92-CF-133 FOR LEAVE TO FILE THE BRIEF, AND THE LODGED BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN NO. 92-CF-133 IS FILED. (By RO)
03/02/1993APPELLANT'S BRIEF IN NO. 92-CF-133.
04/02/1993ORDER - the appointment of Thomas G. Ross, Esquire, is hereby vacated and Barbara E. Sosnick is appointed to represent appellant herein. Thomas G. Ross, Esquire, shall transmit all documents pertaining to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. F/O that the brief of appellant in no. 92-CF-250 shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requst for extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (BY RO)
04/06/1993APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION of court order
04/07/1993APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until 4/12/93.
04/12/1993RECEIVED - aplt's brief
04/15/1993RECEIVED - motion for ext. of time to file ADS
05/17/1993APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (May 24, 1993 no oppo)
05/24/1993RECEIVED APLE's brief
06/02/1993ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEFin no. 92-CF-250 and the appointment of Barbara E. Sosnick, Esquire, is vacated and Thomas G. Ross, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant Lamark Simmons herein. F/O that the lodged brief of appellant in no. 92-CF-250 is filed. (By WHN)
06/02/1993ORDER GRANT APLE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF and the lodged brief of appellee is filed. F/O this case shall be schedule for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits.(By RO)
06/02/1993APPELLEE'S BRIEF - filed
06/02/1993APPELLANT'S BRIEF - (92-CF-250) filed
06/02/1993BRIEFS COMPLETED
07/16/1993FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
09/27/1993LETTER - Reguest to submit without argument
10/04/1993APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUBMIT WITHOUT ARGUMENT and appeal no. 92-CF-133 shall be sumitted without argument. ROTESU
10/08/1993RECEIVED pro se letter from appellant re case.
10/12/1993APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY of direct appeal pending further trial court proceedings.
10/12/1993ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT in appeal no. 92-CF-133. ROTESU
10/12/1993ORDER - Grant appellant's motion to submit without argument in appeal no. 92-CF-133 and appeal no. 92-CF-133 shall be submitted without argument. ROTESU
10/13/1993error
10/13/1993LETTER referring to counsel a letter dated October 5, 1993, received from appellant re this appeal. (JAC)
10/19/1993ORDER - On consideration of the motion of appellant in no. 92-CF-250 to stay appeal pending the disposition of a D.C. Code 23-110 motion in the trial court. it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and these appeals are hereby stayed pending further order of this court. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. U.S. , 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for appellant in no. 92-CF-250 shall advise this court within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of proceedings in the trial court. ROTESU
10/19/1993ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT MOTION FOR STAY ROTESU
12/02/1993RECEIVED pro-se letter dismissing his attorney from his case.
12/06/1993APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY pending appeal (92-CF-133, Hanna).
12/17/1993ORDER On consideration of appellant's motion to stay appeal pending the disposition of a motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code SS23-110, it is ORDERED that the motion is granted and this appeal is hereby stayed pending further order of this court. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consoliated. See Hall v. U.S., 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). It is FURTHERED ORDERED that the appointment of Stephen O. Russell, Esquire, as counsel for appellant is vacated and Noel F. Danto, Esquire is hereby appointed as counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. It is FURTHER ORDERED that newly-appointed counsel shall advised this court within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the proceedings in the trial court. (RO/TE/SU)
01/14/1994APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file appellant's statement of status of 23-110 trial proceedings.
01/14/1994RECEIVED Appellant's Statement of status of 23-110 Trial Proceedings.
02/28/1994Trans to division appellant's motion for leave to file appellant's statement of status of 23-110 trial proceedings, lodged statement. kho
03/03/1994ORDER - Grant appelant's motion for leave to file appellant's statement of the status of the 23-110 trial proceedings and there appearing to be no opposition thereto the lodged statement is filed. F/O that counsel for appellant advise this court of the staus of the proceedings in the trial court within 60 days from the date of this order. ROTESU
04/20/1994RECEIVED copy of an order from D.C. Superior Court Criminal Division.
05/02/1994Check on status of 23-110
05/06/1994APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION- for leave to file statement of consel regarding status of trial motion
05/06/1994RECEIVED -statement of counsel regarding status of trial motion
05/06/1994STATEMENT of appellant advising the court on the status of the pending transcript.
05/16/1994STATEMENT - supplemental status report
07/28/1994APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL (Consent).
08/15/1994ORDER GRANTING the motion of appellant to dismiss appeal in no. 92-CF-99 is granted and appeal no. 92-CF_99 is hereby dismissed. (By AMW) (cont.)
08/15/1994DISMISSED
08/15/1994PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED
09/06/1994MANDATE ISSUED