| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 01/22/1992 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 02/05/1992 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) David C. Gray, Esq. | |
| 02/14/1992 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
| 03/03/1992 | | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
| 04/06/1992 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (458 pgs/calhoun) proc. 11/13-15/91 | |
| 04/07/1992 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (458 pgs. -- Calhoun) (11/13-15/91 proceedings). | |
| 04/14/1992 | | The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By JEP) | |
| 05/28/1992 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 40 days after docketing of the transcripts. | |
| 06/23/1992 | | ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date the complete record is filed. (JAC) | |
| 06/25/1992 | Filed | OPENING EVENT - Opening Event | |
| 06/25/1992 | | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEAL nos. 92-CF-42 and 92-CO-742 for all purposes herein. F/O that David C. Gray. Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in no. 92-CO-742. F/O that appellant shall file the docketing statement in appeal no. 92-CO-742 within 10 days from the date of this order. (JWR) | |
| 06/25/1992 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) David C. Gray, Esq. (for 92-CO-742) | |
| 06/30/1992 | | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
| 07/07/1992 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
| 08/06/1992 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #2 (38 pgs/recorded) proc. 12/20/91 | |
| 08/06/1992 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 08/10/1992 | | NOTE Reporter: Tape Proceeding: 12/20/91 Ordered: 6/11/92 | |
| 09/15/1992 | | ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By WHN) | |
| 11/12/1992 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time, setting forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in his appointment being vacated. (By RO) | |
| 11/13/1992 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY the briefing schedule pending disposition of motion below | |
| 12/15/1992 | | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT MOTION FOR STAY and these appeals are hereby stayed pending further order of this court. F/O that counsel for appellant shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, advise this court as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court requesting a hearing to establish a factual record. (BY JWR) | |
| 02/16/1993 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this co urt within 15 days from the date of this order as to the status of the pending motion, filed in the trial court requesting a hearing to establish a factual record, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in his appointment being vacated. (By RO) | |
| 02/23/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until 4/5/93. | |
| 03/09/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #3 (ord by Judge Burnett on 3/4/93) | |
| 03/31/1993 | | ORDER: Grant the motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before April 5, 1993. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By WHN) | |
| 03/31/1993 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
| 04/08/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY of briefing schedule pendingo outcome of 23-110 motion filed in the trial court. | |
| 04/30/1993 | | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT MOTION FOR STAY and counsel for appellant shall advise this court within 60days from the date of this order as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code Section 23-110. (By WHG) | |
| 07/16/1993 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, file the aforementioned statement, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the statement out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (BY WHN) | |
| 08/10/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file status statement out time. | |
| 08/10/1993 | | RECEIVED STATUS OF TRANSCRIPT. | |
| 08/25/1993 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY to file statuse and the lodged status statement is filed. | |
| 08/25/1993 | | STATEMENT as to status of 23-110 | |
| 01/13/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this co urt within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the pending motion in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code sec. 23-110. (By WHN) | |
| 02/22/1994 | | RECEIVED - aplt's resonse to order | |
| 02/23/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE | |
| 03/16/1994 | | ORD GRT APLT MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE, and the lodged status statement is filed. F/O that counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: WHN) | |
| 03/16/1994 | | STATEMENT of appellant re: status of 23-110 motion. | |
| 04/13/1994 | | STATEMENT filed by appellant counsel regarding status of D.C. Code 23-110 motion. | |
| 06/08/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US. (By: WHN) | |
| 06/21/1994 | | STATEMENT- from appellant re: June 8, 1994 order concerning status of 23-110 motion. | |
| 08/08/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this co urt within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code $23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. U.S. 559 A.2d 1321 , 1322 (D.C. 1989). (BY WHN) | |
| 08/12/1994 | | STATEMENT- of aplt status of D.C. code 23-110 motion | |
| 09/26/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this co urt within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By WHN) | |
| 10/26/1994 | | STATEMENT filed by appellant's counsel, in pursuant to order dated September 26, 1994, about 23-110 motion. | |
| 12/07/1994 | | ORDER that counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days fro mthe date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, afther which the two appeals will be consoldiated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989) (By WHN) | |
| 12/08/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REMAND *EXPEDITED* without prejudice to allow entry of an order granting a new trial. | |
| 12/14/1994 | | RECEIVED - courtsey copy of memorandum opinion handed down by superior court | |
| 12/20/1994 | | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT MOTION TO REMAND, and this appeal is hereby remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. F/O that the Clerk shall hereby issue the mandate in this appeal forthwith. (By: AMW) | |
| 12/20/1994 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
| 12/20/1994 | | REMANDED | |
| 12/20/1994 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |