| Case Information: 92-BG-0222 | |||
| Short Caption: | IN RE: MARK A. MINTZ | Classification: | Bar Governance - Bar - Disciplinary |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | Filed Date: | 02/20/1992 | |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 02/20/1992 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | 05/19/1993 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | |||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Petitioner | Bar Counsel | N |
| ||||||
| Petitioner | Board on Professional Responsibility | N |
| ||||||
| Respondent | Mark A. Mintz | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 02/20/1992 | DISCIPLINARY LETTER From BC transmitting certified copy of order from the Supreme Court of New Jersey. | |||
| 03/12/1992 | Respondent is suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final disposition of this proceeding; Respondent shall show cause before the Board on Professional Responsibility, if cause there be, within 30 days from the date of this order why the identical discipline should not be imposed in the District of Columbia; The Board on Professional Responsibility is directed to recommend promptly thereafter to this court whether reciprocal discipline should be imposed or whether the Board, instead, elects to proceed de novo pursuant to Rule XI, sec. 8; The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order and the order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey to be directed to the Chair of the Board on Professional Responsibility and transmitted to the respondent. (By J. Rogers) | |||
| 11/06/1992 | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD ON PROF. RESP. recommending that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for two years nunc pro tunc to the date of his temporary suspension in this jurisdiction, 3/12/92, with the requirement that he prove fitness before reinstatement. | |||
| 11/12/1992 | LETTER From Bar Counsel advising that they supporr the Board's recommendation and that respondent has failed to file the affidavit required by Rule XI, sec. 14. | |||
| 01/08/1993 | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |||
| 05/19/1993 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 05/19/1993 | SUBMITTED (RO,FE,SU) | |||
| 06/24/1993 | SUSPENSION Accordingly, it is ORDERED that respondent shall be, and hereby is, suspended from the practiceof law in the District of Columbia for a period oftwo years from the date hereof, with reinstatementconditional upon a showing of rehabilitation in accord with the provisions of D.C. Bar R. XI Sec. 3 (a) (2) & 16. (RO, FE, SU) | |||