| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 01/01/1901 | | MORENO, VICTOR T. UNITED STATES | |
| 01/01/1902 | | FOR RT | |
| 06/10/1991 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 06/21/1991 | | RECEIVED PRO SE PLEADING FROM APLT RE MOTION TO TRIAL JUDGE RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 07/23/1991 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) MICHAEL H. HOFFMAN, ESQ. PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 08/01/1991 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DS TO 8/17/91 AJ PANEL SCDATE 080291 SCHPRD DSA | |
| 08/01/1991 | | RECORD ON APPEAL PMB PANEL SCDATE 080991 SCHPRD R | |
| 08/16/1991 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DS TO SEPTEMBER 14, 1991 RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 09/13/1991 | | ORDER APLT MOX X TM FL DSA TO 9/14/91 GRNTD. NFX GR PANELRBH SCDATE 081491 SCHPRD GR | |
| 09/16/1991 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DS TO OCTOBER 8, 1991 RJG PANEL SCDATE 091691 SCHPRD DSA | |
| 10/03/1991 | | ORDER GRT APLT MO X TM TO FL DSA TO 10/8/91. NFX. JJ PANELRBH SCDATE 100291 SCHPRD B | |
| 10/04/1991 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS PMB PANEL SCDATE 100891 SCHPRD DSA | |
| 10/04/1991 | | RECEIVED DSA & SRT PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 10/28/1991 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT JJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 10/28/1991 | | ORDER GRT APLT MO FOR LV TO FL LODGE DOC STMT, DOC STMT FL,F/O APLE BRF W/I 40 DYS FR DTD OF ORDJJ PANELRBH SCDATE 102191 SCHPRD B | |
| 11/04/1991 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY FOR STAY OF BRIEFING SCHDULE AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 12/06/1991 | | ORDER GR MO OF APLT FR STAY OF BRFNG SCHED; BRF OF APLT DUE 40 DAYS FROM DATE RT IS FILED. EVH PANELRBH SCDATE 112791 SCHPRD V | |
| 01/03/1992 | | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF CRT RPTR HART FOR EXT. OF TM TO FL 10/7/82 PROC. TO 2/3/92. PR PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 02/18/1992 | | ORDER DENY CT RPTR HART MOTION AS UNTIMELY FILED. PR PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |
| 02/18/1992 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (57 PGS. -- HART) (10/7/82 PROC.) PR PANEL SCDATE 122891 SCHPRD SR | |
| 02/18/1992 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 03/25/1992 | | ORDER Appellant to advise this court within 10 days whether any additional record is required for this appeal. Failure to advise court in 10 days will result in the issuance of a briefing order. (By JEP) | |
| 04/16/1992 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to file statement regarding the need for additional record for this appeal | |
| 04/16/1992 | | RECEIVED aplt's statement regarding the need for additional record for this appeal | |
| 05/05/1992 | | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS | Granted |
| 05/12/1992 | | ORD GRT COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASON and the appointment of Michael H. Hoffman, Esquire, is hereby vacated, and Diane K. Dildine, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. Michael H. Hoffman, Esquire, shall transmit all documents pertaining to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. (JWR) | |
| 05/12/1992 | | ORDER DENYING APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION as moot for an extension of time to file a statement regarding the need for additional record for this appeal. (JWR) | |
| 05/12/1992 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Diane K. Dildine, Esq. | |
| 06/01/1992 | | STATEMENT of appellant re: status of transcripts. | |
| 06/05/1992 | | The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By JAC) | |
| 07/15/1992 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |
| 07/21/1992 | | TMC - Mot to withdraw appeal | |
| 09/09/1992 | | RECEIVED appellant's pro se motion for release pending appeal. | |
| 11/27/1992 | | LETTER to appellant in response to his letter dated September 1, 1992. (JAC) | |
| 12/14/1992 | | ORDER DENYING the motion of appellant to dismiss this appeal without prejudice to its renewal within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by an affidavit from appellant in accordance with Johnson V. United States, 513 A.2d 798 (D.C. 1986). (BY JWR) | |
| 12/14/1992 | | ORD DNY COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASON as moot. (BY JWR) | |
| 01/04/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for additional time within which to file consent to withdraw appeal. | |
| 01/11/1993 | | RECEIVED consent motion of appellant to withdraw this appeal. | |
| 02/17/1993 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for additional time within which to file a consent motion to withdraw, and the Clerk shall file the lodged motion. (BY JWR) | |
| 02/17/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL (consent) | |
| 02/17/1993 | | ORDER DENY APLT MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL without prejudice to its renewal within 20 days from the date of this order, accompanied by an affidavit from appellant in accordance with Johnson v.United States, 513 A.2d 798 (D.C. 1986). (BY JWR) | |
| 04/01/1993 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time, setting forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in her appointment being vacated. (By RO) | |
| 04/13/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF (anders) | |
| 04/13/1993 | | RECEIVED Appellant's Brief. | |
| 05/11/1993 | | ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF and the lodged brief filed pursuant to Anders v. California, is filed. (BY WHN) | |
| 05/11/1993 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF (anders) | |
| 05/20/1993 | | In the Above case, your court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw from this appeal. If you wish, you may file a response to your attorney's motion by the date set forth in the attached order. In your response, you should set out your reasons why your attorney should not be permitted to withdraw. You may also set forth any grounds for appeal you believe you may have. In the event you need additional time within which to respond, you must advise the court in writing using the self addressed stamped envelope provided. After your response has been received or the time for filing has expired, the motion and any response you may make will be submitted to the court for its consideration. The court will also review the record of the trial proceedings including the court reporter's transcript. If the court concludes the appeal lacks merit and grants the motion of your court-appointed counsel to withdraw, the appeal may be dismissed. Therefore, it is important that you file a response to the motion if your believe there are grounds for appeal. (BY WHN) | |
| 05/20/1993 | | ORDER: Appellant shall file by June 18, 1993_____, any response showing cause why counsel's motion should not be granted, the appeal dismissed, and the judgment from which the appeal was taken affirmed. Failure to respond shall result in the motion being submitted for decision on the motion and record alone. (By JWR) | |
| 06/10/1993 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to counsel's motion to withdraw from this appeal. | |
| 06/18/1993 | | TMC - 5/11/93 BA (anders) & 6/9 Raar | |
| 08/06/1993 | | JUDGMENT GRANT COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS) and it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal be, and hereby is, affirmed. (by: STSCRE) | |
| 08/06/1993 | | AFFIRMED | |
| 08/30/1993 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
| 09/10/1993 | | LETTER - of aplt asking for enbanc and appointment of new counsel | |
| 09/17/1993 | | ORDER deny appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. See Wise v. U.S. Further Ordered that the motion to proceed en banc is granted and appellant's pet for reh/reh en banc shall be filed w/i 30 days from the date of this order. Further extensions of time will be granted only under extraordinary circumstances. (STSCRY) | |
| 10/01/1993 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to court's order dated September 17, 1993. (Petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc.) | |
| 03/11/1994 | | ORD DENY APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC (pro se petition) (Judges Terry and Farrell are recused from this case.) (EB) | |