| Case Information: 91-CV-0078 | |||
| Short Caption: | RICHARD M. ARONOFF V. THE LENKIN COMPANY | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CA1053-88 | Filed Date: | 01/22/1991 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 01/22/1991 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 06/13/1991 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | 12/13/1991 | ||
| Argued/Submitted: | 06/18/1992 | ||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 01/26/1993 | ||
| Party Information | ||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | |||||||
| Appellant | Richard M. Aronoff | N |
| |||||||||
| Appellee | Lenkin Company | N |
| |||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 01/01/1901 | ARONOFF, RICHARD M. ET AL THE LENKIN COMPANY ET AL | |||
| 01/01/1902 | SCRND/REG | |||
| 01/01/1903 | NOTE - 01 6/24/91 ORD: GRANTED MOTION TO NOTE - 01 CONSOLIDATE #91-77 WITH NOS. NOTE - 02 90-1425 THRU 90-1429 & 90-1532 NOTE - 02 FOR ALL PURPOSES, F/O GRANTED NOTE - 03 MO TO CONSIDER APEALS JOINTLY NOTE - 03 AND CONSOLDIATED APPEALS SHALL NOTE - 04 BE SCHD BEFORE THE SAME MERITS NOTE - 04 DIVISION THE SAME DAY UPON NOTE - 05 COMPLETION OF BRFING, F/O THE NOTE - 05 MO TO SUPP THE REC IS GRANTED, NOTE - 06 THE MEMO ORD, DTD 12/24/90 IS NOTE - 06 FILED AS SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD. NOTE - 07 CON: NOS. 90-1425 THRU 90-1429 NOTE - 07 90-1532, 91-77 & 91-78. | |||
| 01/22/1991 | Filed | OPENING EVENT - Opening Event | ||
| 02/01/1991 | DESIGNATION OF RECORD & SRT RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 02/01/1991 | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 02/01/1991 | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 02/04/1991 | RECEIVED COPY OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND FILED IN SUPERIOR COURT RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 03/04/1991 | MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION OF APLT TO CONSIDER APPEALS JOINTLY AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 03/04/1991 | MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION OF APLT MO TO CONSIDER APPEALS JOINTLY AD PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 03/14/1991 | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO CONSIDER APPEALS JOINTLY RJG PANEL SCDATE 031891 SCHPRD OPE | |||
| 03/22/1991 | APPELLANT'S REPLY TO APPELLEES OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO CONSIDER APPEALS JOINTLY RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 06/13/1991 | Filed | Record Completed | ||
| 06/13/1991 | RECORD ON APPEAL 681 PGS. - CALHOUN & 193A PGS. PAVLISH(DEPOSITION & TWO LARGE BROWN ENVELOPES OF EXHIBITS)PR PANEL SCDATE 040191 SCHPRD R | |||
| 06/24/1991 | ORDER (SEE NOTES 1 THRU 7) JB PANELRO SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 06/24/1991 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD (MEMORANDUM ORDER, 12/24/90) JB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/17/1991 | MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION OF CRT RPTR C.R. FRANKLIN FOR EXT. OF TIME TO FILE 11/5/90 THRU 11/6/90 PROC. TO 7/31/91 PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 08/15/1991 | ORDER DEN CT RPTR FRANKLIN'S MOTION AS UNTIMELY FILED. PR PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 08/16/1991 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (395 PGS. -- FRANKLIN) PROC. 11/5/90 - 11/6/90 PR PANEL SCDATE 040191 SCHPRD RT | |||
| 09/13/1991 | LETTER FROM APPELLANT REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 10/04/1991 | ORDER APLT BRF DUE W/IN 40 DYS FRM DT OF ORD. APLE BRF DUE W/IN 30 DYS THEREAFTER. NFX GR PANELRBH SCDATE 092491 SCHPRD GR | |||
| 10/30/1991 | LETTER FROM APLT COUNSEL RE CONSOL. CASES PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 11/13/1991 | APPELLANT'S BRIEF APPENDIX A & B EXHIBITS PMB PANEL SCDATE 111391 SCHPRD BA | |||
| 12/13/1991 | Filed | Briefing Completed | ||
| 12/13/1991 | APPELEE'S BRIEF PMB PANEL SCDATE 121391 SCHPRD BE | |||
| 12/23/1991 | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 05/22/1992 | grant appellee's motion for rescheduling oral argument from 6/11/92 regular calendar to 6/18/92 at 1:30 p.m. | |||
| 06/01/1992 | On further consideration of the order of June 24, 1991, and of the order of May 22, 1992, it is ORDERED SUA SPONTE that No. 91-CV-78 be presented first, to be followed by Nos. 90-CV-1425,26,27,29,90-CV-1532 & 90-CV-77. In each of the two arguments, each side shall be allocated twenty minutes to argument | |||
| 06/18/1992 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
| 06/18/1992 | ARGUED RG FA PY Burton A. Schwalb, Esq. for appellant; Mark D. Hopson, Esq. for appellee. | |||
| 12/30/1992 | REVERSED AND REMANDED Judgment RV judgment on appeal & RM case for further consideration as set forth in opinion filed (90-CV-1425 etc. RV in part & AF in part as set forth in opinion) (RG FA PY) | |||
| 01/26/1993 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||