Case Information: 10-AA-1025 | |||
Short Caption: | DAMION FLUELLYN V. DC DEP'T OF EMPLOYMENT SERVS. | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Worker's Compensation |
Lead: | 10-AA-0689 | Consolidated: | 10-AA-1025 |
Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CRB101-10 | Filed Date: | 08/20/2010 |
| |||
Opening Event Date: | 08/20/2010 | Case Status: | Decided/Dismissed |
Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
Briefs Completed: | 12/28/2010 | ||
Argued/Submitted: | 05/12/2011 | ||
Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
Mandate Issued: | 07/23/2012 |
Party Information | |||||||||
Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
Petitioner | Damion Fluellyn | N |
| ||||||
Respondent | D.C. Department of Employment Services - Worker's Comp. | N |
|
Events | ||||
Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
08/20/2010 | PETITION FOR REVIEW | |||
08/20/2010 | FILING FEE of $100.00. | |||
08/20/2010 | CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD, Todd Kim, Esq. & Gregory Lamb, Esq. | |||
08/27/2010 | ORDERED, that petitioner's motion to consolidate is gratned and petitions for review nos. 10-AA-689 and 10-AA-1025 are consolidated fo all purposes herein. It is F/O that petitioner's motion to stay briefin is granted to the extent that a consolidated briefing order will be issued upon the filing of the record in petition for review no. 10-AA-1025. It is F/O that the agency shall file the record in petition for review no. 10-AA-1025 within 60 days from the date of this order. (JAC) | |||
08/27/2010 | RECORD ON APPEAL (10-AA-1025) | |||
09/03/2010 | ORDERED that petitioner's consolidated brief and the appendix, including the document required by D.C. App. R. 39(a)(1), shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and respondent's and intervenor's briefs shall be field within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. R. 30, 31. (JAC) | |||
10/13/2010 | PETITIONER'S BRIEF | |||
10/13/2010 | APPENDIX - petitioner's | |||
10/26/2010 | INTERVENOR'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF NO OPPO 30 days 12/13/10 | |||
11/03/2010 | On consideration of the motion of intervenor_ for an extension of time within which to file the brief, to which no opposition has been filed, it is ORDERED that the motion of intervenor is granted and the brief of intervenor shall be filed on or before December 13, 2010. (JAC) | |||
12/02/2010 | It appearing that the brief of petitioner was filed with this court on October 13, 2010, and the brief of respondent was due to be filed on or before November 17, 2010, but the brief has not yet been filed with this court, it is ORDERED that respondent shall within 20 days from the date of this order submit the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. (JAC) | |||
12/13/2010 | INTERVENOR'S BRIEF | |||
12/17/2010 | RESPONDENT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to statement in lieu of brief no oppo | |||
12/17/2010 | RECEIVED- respondent's statement in lieu of brief | |||
12/20/2010 | PTNR MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF (Fluellyn) to 1/15/11 no oppo | |||
12/28/2010 | ORDER GRANT PTNR MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION and the lodged statement in lieu of brief is filed. | |||
12/28/2010 | ORDER GRANT PTNR MO TO EXT TIME TO FILE REPLY BRF and the reply brief of petitioner shall be filed on or before January 18, 2011. It is F/O that this matter shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division of this court as soon as the calendar permits. (JAC) | |||
12/28/2010 | STATEMENT | |||
12/28/2010 | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |||
01/18/2011 | PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF | |||
02/02/2011 | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |||
02/02/2011 | It appearing that this appeal is likely to be calendared for argument during the month(s) of April 2011 through June 2011, it is ORDERED that counsel shall advise this court in writing by FEB. 14, 2011, of specific dates du ring that period when they are unavailable so that the court can attempt to avoid such dates in scheduling argument. (Please see the attached instruction sheet.) (aj) Julio Castillo Clerk | |||
02/09/2011 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING (Petitioner) | |||
02/09/2011 | LETTER - from DOES letting court no that DOES will no participate in appeal | |||
02/10/2011 | APPEARANCE of Sarah Rollman as counsel for intervenor. | |||
02/10/2011 | LETTER FROM COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING intervenor | |||
02/10/2011 | APPEARANCE- of Sarah Rollman on behalf of intervenor | |||
04/05/2011 | CALENDAR NOTICE SENT | |||
05/10/2011 | LETTER - from petitioner regarding corrections made in the reply brief | |||
05/11/2011 | LETTER - from the intervenor (WMATA) stating that Sarah O. Rollman will argue the case in place of Mark F. Sullivan | |||
05/12/2011 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | ||
05/12/2011 | ARGUED before Judges Ruiz, Glickman, Terry Richard W. Galiher, Jr. Esq, for the APPELLANT Sarah O. Rollman, Esq. for the APPELLEE | |||
06/28/2012 | Filed | Affirmed (OPINION) (Glickman, Associate Judge, Ruiz, Associate Judge, Retired*, and Terry, Senior Judge.) | ||
07/23/2012 | Filed | Mandate |