| Case Information: 91-CV-0446 | |||
| Short Caption: | DIANA CORTO V. NATIONAL SCENERY STUDIOS, INC. | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CA0678-85 | Filed Date: | 04/11/1991 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 04/11/1991 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 06/17/1992 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||||||||
| Appellant | Diana Corto | N | Pro Se | N | |||||||||||
| Appellee | National Scenery Studios Inc. | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 01/01/1901 | CORTO, DIANA ET AL NATIONAL SCENERY STUDIOS, INC. | |||
| 01/01/1902 | MMS & RPA | |||
| 04/11/1991 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 07/03/1991 | ORDER APLTS TO FL DSA IN 10 DAYS; CLK TO PREP & TRANS REC TO COURT W/OUT FEE FORTHWITH. EVH PANELRO SCDATE 062591 SCHPRD V | |||
| 07/10/1991 | RECORD ON APPEAL PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 07/16/1991 | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT AJ PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 12/06/1991 | ORDER APLT IN 20 DAYS SHOW CAUSE WHY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION JB PANELRO SCDATE 111591 SCHPRD TO | |||
| 01/08/1992 | RECEIVED APPELLANT'S REPLY TO THIS COURT'S 12/6/91 OTSC RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 01/16/1992 | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED RJG PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 02/24/1992 | RECEIVED LTR TO ULISSES HAMMOND PMB PANEL SCDATE 000000 SCHPRD | |||
| 05/27/1992 | ORDER that the motion for leave to file response to this court's December 6, 1991, order to show cause is granted, and the lodged response is hereby filed. It is further ordered that appeal nos. 91-CV-446, 91-CV-1159 and 91-CV-1282 are hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. It is further ordered that the motion to supplement the record in no. 92-SP-14 is granted. It is further ordered that the petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied. It is further ordered that the motion for stay of trial proceedings pending appellate review is denied as moot. (by: SCKNBE) | |||
| 05/27/1992 | DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, | |||
| 06/17/1992 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||