judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

CITIZENS ASSOC. OF GEORGETOWN V. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT

Case Information: 92-AA-1165
Short Caption:CITIZENS ASSOC. OF GEORGETOWN V. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTClassification:Agency - Administrative Agency - Bd Of Zoning Adjustment (BZA)
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:Filed Date:09/28/1992

Opening Event Date:09/28/1992Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:04/08/1993Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:10/13/1993
Argued/Submitted:04/13/1994
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:12/19/1994

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
Intervenor-RespondentDistrict of ColumbiaN
Lutz Alexander Prager YN
Charles L. Reischel NN
PetitionerCitizens Association of GeorgetownN
Martha M. Kendrick NN
Steven M. SchneebaumYY
PetitionerDon Crockett N
Martha M. Kendrick NN
Steven M. SchneebaumNY
RespondentD.C. Board of Zoning AdjustmentN
Charles L. Reischel NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/28/1992PETITION FOR REVIEW
09/28/1992$50.00 DOCKETING FEE
09/28/1992CERTIFIED COPY OF PETITION TO BOARD & Charles L. Reischel.
10/07/1992PETITIONER'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
01/12/1993PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY pending review.
01/12/1993MOTION(S) FEE PAID
01/19/1993INTERVENOR'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for extension of time to respond to motion for a stay ( for 3 days)
01/19/1993MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE of D.C. on behalf of respondent.
01/22/1993RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION to motion for stay
01/25/1993RECEIVED - corrected first page of aple's oppo to motion for motion for stay
01/28/1993TMC Petitioner's Motion for Stay Motion by the District of Columbia for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for a Stay Opposition by the District of Columbia to Motion to Stay Motion for Leave to Intervene of D.C. on behalf of respondent.
02/01/1993PETITIONER'S REPLY to the opposition by the D.C. to petitioner's motion for a stay pending review.
02/08/1993PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION for expedited review and oral argument.
02/08/1993MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mpms
02/16/1993RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE - to aplt motion for expedited review and oral argument (no oppo)
03/02/1993PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION requesting that the court lodge in the record exhibits attached
03/02/1993MOTION(S) FEE PAID
03/05/1993VOTE SHEET - Petitioners' motion for stay - Motion by D.C. to intervene - Motion by DC to extend to respond to motion for stay - DC Opposition - Petitioners' reply - Petitioners' motion to expedite & for argument - DC's responde to moiton to expedite & argument - Petitioners' memo to the court regarding supplemental developments
03/08/1993PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION under rule 18
03/10/1993RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to emergency motion and to motion to lodge
03/12/1993ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE of the District of Columbia on behalf of respondent. (by: KGSUBE
03/12/1993ORDER DENYING INTV MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION of D.C. to extend time to respond to motion for stay AS MOOT. (by: KGSUBE)
03/12/1993ORDER DENY PTNR MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION for expedited review. (by: KGSUBE)
03/12/1993ORDER DENYING petitioners' motion for oral argument. (by: KGSUBE)
03/12/1993ORDER DENYING PETITIONER MOTION FOR STAY (by: KGSUBE)
03/12/1993ORDER GRANT PTNR MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to lodge a portion of the administrative record. (by: KGSUBE)
03/12/1993ORDER DENYING PTNR MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION under rule 18. (by: KGSUBE)
03/12/1993ORDER that respondent shall file the administrative record within 15 days from the date of this order. (by: KGSUBE)
04/08/1993RECORD ON APPEAL (Two large White Boxes)
04/08/1993RECORD COMPLETED
06/17/1993ORDER: The brief of petitioner shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of respondent shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By WHN)
07/20/1993PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 14 days - no oppo
07/20/1993MOTION(S) FEE PAID
08/12/1993RECEIVED - mot. for leave to file brief
08/12/1993RECEIVED - BP
08/13/1993PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF
08/13/1993MOTION(S) FEE PAID
08/31/1993ORDER GRANTING PTNR MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEFand the lodged brief of petitioner is filed. F/O that the briefs of respondent and intervenor shall be filed on or before September 9, 1993. (By WHN)
08/31/1993PETITIONER'S BRIEF - filed
09/10/1993ORDER - ORDERED that this court's order of August 31, 1993, is amended to the extent that the briefs of respondent and intervenor shall be filed on or before September 14, 1993. (By WHN)
09/13/1993RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until 10/13/93. (no oppo.)
09/28/1993ORDER GRANT RESP MOTION TO EXT TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the brief of respondent shall be filed on or before October 13, 1993. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (by: Ng)
10/13/1993INTERVENOR'S BRIEF
10/13/1993BRIEFS COMPLETED
10/27/1993PTNR MOTION TO EXTEND TIMF TO FILE REPLY BRIEF until 11/8/93.
11/02/1993ORD GRT PTNR MO TO EXT TIME TO FILE reply brief on or before November 8, 1993. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (by: WHN)
11/08/1993PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF
11/08/1993PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file the record of this case with the documents attached.
12/03/1993FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
12/16/1993ORDER GRANT PTNR MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to supplement the record and respondent shall certify and transmit the documents specified in petitioner's motion as Exhibits A through F as a supplemental record forthwith. (By RO)
03/30/1994PETITIONER'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION - to lodge
03/30/1994MOTION(S) FEE PAID
03/31/1994CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28
04/04/1994MEMORANDUM - Trans to division correspondence filed by counsel for petitioner on 3/31/94 pursuant to rule 28 k
04/07/1994RESPONDENT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE by th district of columbia to motion to lodge.
04/11/1994CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28
04/13/1994FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
04/13/1994ARGUED (FE,TE,PR) Steven M Schneebaum, Esquire, for appellant. Lutz A .Prager, Esquire, for appellee.
04/18/1994ORDER - Grant the motion of petitioners to lodge, construed as a motion to supplement the record on appeal with Zoning Commission Order No. 754 and the Proposed Decision of the Board of Appeals and Review in Bar Case No. 92-3869-CON, and the response by the District of Columbia is granted and the two documents, attached as exhibits to the motion, are deemed part of the record on appeal in this matter. FETEPY
05/26/1994REVERSED AND REMANDED Opinion
06/14/1994INTERVENOR'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for stay of the mandate.
06/27/1994PETITIONER'S ANSWER/RESPONSE - to intervenor's motion to stay mandate
06/30/1994RESPONDENT'S REPLY - in support of motion to stay mandate
07/01/1994RECEIVED - amendment to petitoners' response to intervenor's motion to stay mandate filed on June 24,1994
07/14/1994ORDER - The motion of the District of Columbia to stay the issuance of the mandate is granted and the Clerk is directed to stay the issuance of the mandate until September 20, 1994. FETEPY
09/14/1994INTERVENOR'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION for further stay of mandate.
09/21/1994ORDER - Grant the motion by the District of Columbia for further stay of mandate and the Clerk is directed to extend the stay and the issuance of the mandate until December 19, 1994. FEKGPY
12/19/1994MANDATE ISSUED