| Case Information: 92-AA-1319 | |||
| Short Caption: | ALLEN LESTER V. D.C. DEPT OF EMPLOY SERVICES | Classification: | Agency - Administrative Agency - Unemployment Compensation |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | Filed Date: | 03/29/1993 | |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 03/29/1993 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 09/09/1996 | ||
| Costs Waived | |||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Petitioner | Allen D. Lester | Y | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Respondent | D.C. Department of Employment Services - Unemployment | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 11/02/1992 | RECEIVED - PFR | |||
| 11/02/1992 | PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |||
| 01/04/1993 | ORDER DENY PTNR MO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS without prej to renewal within 30 by filing a new motion with complete answer to question 4(a). Petitioner shall show cause in 30 days as to why the petition for review should not be dismissed as untimely filed. (RO) | |||
| 02/03/1993 | PETITIONER'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to Court's order. | |||
| 03/29/1993 | ORDER The motion of petitioner is granted and the lodged petition for review is filed. F/O that petitioner shall file the docketing statement within 20 days from the date of this order. F/O that respondent shall file the record on appeal within 20 days from the date of this order. (By RO) | |||
| 03/29/1993 | PETITION FOR REVIEW - filed | |||
| 04/16/1993 | PETITIONER'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |||
| 05/11/1994 | ORDER: Respondent shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the record on appeal, accompanied by a motion for leave to late file the record on appeal out of time, setting forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the record on appeal or to request an extension of time within which to do so. (By WHN) | |||
| 07/25/1996 | RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO REMAND - case for furher administrative proceedings | |||
| 08/08/1996 | TMC - Respondent's motion to remand case | |||
| 08/16/1996 | ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT MOTION TO REMAND and this case is hereby remanded to the agency for further proceedings consistent with those specified in the motion. (by: FARDPY) | |||
| 08/16/1996 | REMANDED | |||
| 09/09/1996 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||