| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 08/20/1992 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 08/31/1992 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) David J. Sitomer, Esq. | |
| 09/10/1992 | | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
| 09/14/1992 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS | |
| 09/14/1992 | | RECEIVED APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT. | |
| 10/01/1992 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (12 pgs. -- Kaczorowski) (4/24/92 proceedings). | |
| 10/02/1992 | | ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS and the lodged docketing statement is filed. | |
| 10/02/1992 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
| 11/06/1992 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (88-pgs/carter 4/27/92 proc.) | |
| 11/12/1992 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (175-pgs/hunt 5/19/92 proc.) | |
| 12/01/1992 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #4 (22 pgs/Burns) proc. 5/27/92 | |
| 04/13/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (537 pgs. - Hunt) (5/20 - 5/22/92 proc.) | |
| 04/26/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #5 (order/judge kennedy 4/20/93) | |
| 07/09/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (142 pgs. - Graybill) (5/26/92 proc.) | |
| 07/09/1993 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 05/11/1994 | | ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By WHN) | |
| 05/17/1994 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to the court motion for extension of time to file briefs. | |
| 06/01/1994 | | ORDER GRANTING APLT'T MOTION TO EXTEND TIME and the motion is construed as a motion for stay and granted, and this appeal is hereby stayed pending further order of this order. F/O that counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of tht denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeal will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (by: FERREN) | |
| 06/01/1994 | | CASE STAYED | |
| 06/22/1994 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE -to June 1, 1994 order | |
| 08/10/1994 | | ORDER - ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989) (By WHN) | |
| 09/14/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file report to the court late. | |
| 09/14/1994 | | RECEIVED Appellant's report to the court. | |
| 10/04/1994 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file a statement and the lodged statement is filed. (By WHN) | |
| 10/04/1994 | | ORDER - ORDERED that counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. (By WHN) | |
| 10/04/1994 | | STATEMENT - filed | |
| 11/04/1994 | | STATEMENT- of aplt (report to the court/ leave to late file same. | |
| 11/23/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this co urt within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in thr trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). BY WHN | |
| 12/19/1994 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 02/06/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US. (By: WHN) | |
| 02/10/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION filed by David Sitomer, counsel for appellant. | |
| 04/18/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: WHN) | |
| 05/03/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 05/31/1995 | | ORDER, sua sponte, that the stay entered by this court on June 1, 1994, in no. 92-CF-1039, is hereby vacated. F/O, sua sponte, that appeals nos. 92-CF-1039 and 95-CO-488 are consolidated for all purposes herein. F/O that David J. Sitomer, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant in appeal no. 95-CO-488. (By: AMW) | |
| 05/31/1995 | | error | |
| 05/31/1995 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
| 07/07/1995 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (204-pgs/salazar 4/6-7/95 proc.) | |
| 07/14/1995 | | RECORD ON APPEAL (95-CO-488) | |
| 11/21/1995 | | ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed wit hin 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days th ereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: WHN) | |
| 01/02/1996 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF for 92-CF-1039 & 95-CO-488 | |
| 02/05/1996 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 2/23/96 - no oppo | |
| 02/23/1996 | | RECEIVED - aple's brief | |
| 02/26/1996 | | APLE MOTION FOR LV TO FILE AMENDED/CORRECTED BRIEF | |
| 02/26/1996 | | RECEIVED - aple's corrected brief | |
| 06/11/1996 | | ORD GRT APLE MO FOR LV TO FL AMENDED/CORRECTED BRF and the lodged corrected brief of appellee is filed. F/O that these appeals shall be scheduled for consideration before a merits division as soon as the calendar permits. (BY: GP). | |
| 06/11/1996 | | APPELLEE'S AMENDED/CORRECTED BRIEF | |
| 06/11/1996 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 06/27/1996 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
| 06/27/1996 | | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
| 10/18/1996 | | ARGUED (TE,KG,RU) David J. Sitomer, Esquire, for appellant. Magdalena Bell, Esquire, for appellee. | |
| 05/22/1997 | | CASE STAYED -- record remand | |
| 11/18/1997 | | ORDER - ORDERED that, while this matter remains pending in the trial court, counsel for appellant shall advise this court every 3 months, with the first report due on December 15, 1997, as to the status of the proceedings in the trial court. Counsel for appellant shall advise this court in writing within 15 dyas after conclusion of the proceedings on record remand. (GP) | |
| 12/03/1997 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 12/03/1997 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (by Douglas Wham, who had been aptd counsel by the trial court on remand). | |
| 12/05/1997 | | ORDER GRANTING APLT MO FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ORDERED that the motion is granted and Douglas Wham, Esquire is appointed to represent appellant herein; the appt of David Sitomer, Esq. is hereby vacated. F/O that the Clerk of the Sup. Ct. is directed to prepare and transmit a supplemental record consisting of the relevant papers and exhibits relating to the remand proceedings. (TE/KG/RZ) | |
| 12/05/1997 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) W. Douglas Wham, Esq. | |
| 12/10/1997 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #5 (remand memo, ord statingrecording shall be made part of rec notice in support of gvt's oppo to mot for new trial, etc.) | |
| 12/18/1997 | | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - ORDERED that appellant shall show cause no later than 1/20/98, why the judgment of the trial court should not be affirmed in light of the 10/15/97 memorandum on the trial court remand. (TE/KG/RZ) | |
| 12/18/1997 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #6 (Cassette tape) | |
| 01/20/1998 | | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE -to 12/18/97 order | |
| 01/28/1998 | | ORDER - ORDERED that the order to show cause is hereby discharged. It is F/O that appellant shall make the necessary arrangements to have the transcript of the hearing on remand prepared and transmitted to this court as a supplemental record. It is F/O that upon the filing of the supplemental record, the parties are to file supplemental briefs, with appellant's brief to be filed within 30 days of the supplemental record, and appellee's responsive brief filed within 30 days thereafter. (TE/KG/RZ) | |
| 03/27/1998 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #7 (Rpt. Trans 9/26/97 Proc.- 38 Pgs.-Rpt. V. Williams). | |
| 03/27/1998 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
| 04/02/1998 | | ORDER - ORDERED that appellant's supplemental brief shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this order and appellee's responsive brief shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. (TE/KG/RZ) | |
| 05/04/1998 | | APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM | |
| 06/08/1998 | | APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM | |
| 06/26/1998 | | APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF to 7/20/98 no oppo | |
| 07/06/1998 | | ORD GRANT APLT MO TO EXT TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF until 7/20/98. (TE/KG/RZ) | |
| 07/16/1998 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
| 07/17/1998 | | ORDER (TE,KG,RU) This matter is scheduled for a special sitting on August 12, 1998 at 2:00 p.m.. The parties are to be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located on the sixth floor, at 1:55 p.m. on that date. | |
| 08/12/1998 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 08/12/1998 | | ARGUED (TE,KG,RU) W. Douglas Wham, Esquire, for appellant. Megan E. Hills, Esquire, for appellee. | |
| 02/08/2001 | Filed | AFFIRMED opinion | |
| 02/21/2001 | | APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC | |
| 02/28/2001 | | ORDER that appellee within 14 days from the date of this order shall file a response to pet for reh/reh en banc (10 copies). (WA) | |
| 03/14/2001 | | APLE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSEto 4/13/01. no oppo | |
| 03/16/2001 | | ORD GRT APLE MO TO EXT TM TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE to pet for reh/reh en banc on or before April 13, 2001. (WA) | |
| 04/12/2001 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's pet for reh/reh en banc. | |
| 06/25/2001 | | ORD DENY APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC (WATESTSCFARZRDGLWHKG) (Judge Ruiz would grant rehearing. Judges Schwelb and Ruiz would grant rehearing en banc.) | |
| 07/03/2001 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
| 07/30/2001 | | error | |
| 08/07/2001 | | COPY OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI W. Douglas Wham, Esquire appointed to file Cert. Pet. (forthcoming) | |
| 09/21/2001 | | NOTICE OF FILING A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI | |
| 10/18/2001 | | NOTICE OF DENIAL OF PET. FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI | |