| Case Information: 95-CT-1698 | |||
| Short Caption: | STANLEY BROWN V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal - DC - Traffic |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | D2165-94 | Filed Date: | 11/22/1995 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 11/22/1995 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 02/29/1996 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 11/19/1996 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Appellant | Stanley Brown | N |
| ||||||
| Appellee | District of Columbia | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 11/22/1995 | NOTICE OF APPEAL - trial attorney Harold D. Martin Bar No. 368939 Phone No. (202) 452-8080 | |||
| 02/21/1996 | RECORD ON APPEAL -- 46 pages | |||
| 02/29/1996 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (18 pages--Taped) (10/6/95 proc.) | |||
| 02/29/1996 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 06/24/1996 | ORDER: Appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the docketing statement out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the docketing statement or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: GP) | |||
| 06/24/1996 | ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed wit hin 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days th ereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: GP) | |||
| 09/09/1996 | ORDER: Appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement and brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the docketing statement out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either t timely file the docketing statement or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall result in thedismissal of thi appeal. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By AMW) | |||
| 10/25/1996 | ORDER: This appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: AMW) | |||
| 10/25/1996 | DISMISSED | |||
| 11/19/1996 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||