LOUIS A. KLEIMAN V. CAROLYN R. KLEIMAN - District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

Case Information: 92-CV-0554
Short Caption:	LOUIS A. KLEIMAN V. CAROLYN R. KLEIMAN	Classification:	Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:	CA3459-86	Filed Date:	03/05/1992

Opening Event Date:	03/05/1992	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:	06/15/1992	Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:	09/28/1993

Party Information

Appellate Role

Party Name

IFP

Attorney(s)

Arguing Attorney

E-Filer

Appellant

Louis A. Kleiman

Ted Kavrukov

Appellee

Carolyn R. Kleiman

Rebecca J. Habbert

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
03/05/1992		NOTICE OF APPEAL
05/27/1992		Appellant shall tender the $50 docketing fee and file the docketing statement with this court, and file the designation of record and statement regarding transcript with the Superior Court, Office of Appeals Coordinator, Room 3148, and shall simultaneously file a copy of those documents with this court within 10 days from the date of this order, or this appeal may be dismissed. (By WDF)
06/08/1992		$50.00 DOCKETING FEE
06/08/1992		APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
06/08/1992		DESIGNATION OF RECORD
06/08/1992		STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S)
06/10/1992		COPY OF SUPERIOR COURT LETTER to aplt counsel dtd 6/10/92 re record pick up
06/15/1992		RECORD ON APPEAL
06/15/1992		RECORD COMPLETED
06/19/1992		COUNTER DESIGNATION OF RECORD
06/23/1992		SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (Motion for REconsideration of order dated 2/14/92 & oppo to plaintiff's motion to re-docket order of 8/17/90; Points & authorities; Blank order; Counter Designation of Record).
07/22/1992		APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
07/22/1992		MOTION(S) FEE PAID
08/03/1992		APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to motion to dismiss by appellee
08/06/1992		TMC - Aple's motion to dismiss & oppo.
08/10/1992		APPELLEE'S REPLY TO APPELLANTS OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS.
09/02/1993		ORDER: This appeal is dismissed as prematurely filed, see Carter v. Cathedral Avenue Cooperative, Inc., 532 A.2d 681, 683-84 (D.C. 1987), without prejudice to the filing of new appeals by either party with respect to any then appealable orders upon final disposition of the motion for reconsideration of the order of Judge Webber permitting redocketing. (ST, SU, MK)
09/02/1993		DISMISSED
09/28/1993		MANDATE ISSUED