WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT V. STACY BEACHUM

Case Information: 94-CV-0200
Short Caption:	WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT V. STACY BEACHUM	Classification:	Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Lead:	94-CV-0200	Consolidated:	94-CV-0273
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:	CA5858-92	Filed Date:	02/14/1994
Opening Event Date:	02/14/1994	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:	06/22/1994	Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:	08/31/1994
Argued/Submitted:	02/28/1995
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:	04/26/1995

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
02/14/1994		NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/31/1994		ORDER: Appellant shall, within 15 days from the dater of this order, tender the $50 docketing fee, and file the docketing statement, designation of record, and statement regarding transcript with the Superior Court, Office of Appeals Coordinator, Room 3148; appellant shall simultaneously file a copy of those documents with this court, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the documents out of time and this court's $10 motion fee. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By WHN)
04/26/1994		DISMISSED
05/03/1994		APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL, CONSOLIDATE, AND TO ACCEPT PRELIMINARY FORMS AND RECORD OUT OF TIME.
05/03/1994		MOTION(S) FEE PAID
05/03/1994		$50.00 DOCKETING FEE
05/17/1994		APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION
05/17/1994		MOTION(S) FEE PAID
05/17/1994		RECEIVED - aple's opposition to aplt's motion for reinstate
05/25/1994		RECEIVED appellant's response to appellee's opposition to appellant's motion to reinstate appeal
06/22/1994		ORD GRANT APLE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OPPOSITION, and the Clerk shall file the lodged opposition (to appellant's motion to reinstate...) and the response thereto. (More)
06/22/1994		APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to reinstate, to consolidate and to accept preliminary forms and record out of time.
06/22/1994		APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to appellee's opposition to motion to reinstate, etc.
06/22/1994		ORDER GRANT APPELLANT MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL no. 94-CV-200. F/O that the motion of appellant to consolidate appeal nos. 94-CV-200 and 94-CV-273 is GRANTED, and appeal nos. 94-CV-200 and 94-CV-273 for all purposes herein. (More)
06/22/1994		ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DS and designation of record in appeal no. 94-CV-273,and the Clerk shall file the lodged docketing statement and designation of record. F/O that the motion of appellant to accept preliminary forms and record out of time is GRANTED to the extent that the docketing statement, designation of record and record on appeal filed in appeal no. 94-CV-273 are hereby deemed as the docketing statement designation of record and record on appeal in appeal no. 94-CV-200. F/O that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: AMW)
06/22/1994		APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
06/22/1994		DESIGNATION OF RECORD
06/22/1994		RECORD ON APPEAL (See 94cv273)
06/22/1994		RECORD COMPLETED
07/29/1994		APPELLANT'S BRIEF w/appendix
08/31/1994		APPELLEE'S BRIEF
08/31/1994		BRIEFS COMPLETED
10/05/1994		FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
02/28/1995	Filed	ACTION - Argued / Submitted
02/28/1995		ARGUED (TE,RU,MK) David R. Keyser, Esquire, for appellant. Patrick M. Regan, Esquire, for appellee.
04/03/1995		AFFIRMED MOJ (TE,RU,MK)
04/18/1995		APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR COSTS & ATTORNEY FEES
04/18/1995		MOTION(S) FEE PAID
04/20/1995		TMC - 4/18 Aple's Request for costs
04/26/1995		MANDATE ISSUED
06/04/1996		ORDER GRANT APPELLEE MO FOR COSTS & ATTORNEY FEES in part, in the amount of $10 and the Clerk of the Superior Court shall add this amount to the mandate pursuant to D.C. App. R. 39(d). F/O that the requests for costs pertaining to the cost of the transcript and the Superior Court filing fee are denied without prejudice to renewal in the trial court pursuant to D.C. App. R. 39(e). (BY: TE,SC,MK)