| Case Information: 93-CM-1153 | |||
| Short Caption: | JOHN M. STEWART V. UNITED STATES | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal Misdemeanor - Drug Related |
| Lead: | 93-CM-1153 | Consolidated: | 93-CO-1183 |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | M5355-92 | Filed Date: | 08/25/1993 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 08/25/1993 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 11/12/1993 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 08/18/1994 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Appellant | John M. Stewart | N | |||||||
| Appellee | United States | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 08/25/1993 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 11/05/1993 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
| 11/10/1993 | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS and appeal nos. 93-CM-1153 and 93-CO-1183 are consolidated for all purposes. F/O that Lawrence M. Baskir, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant in these appeals. F/O that appellant shall file the docketing statement in these appeals within 15 days from the date of this order. (BY RO) | |||
| 11/10/1993 | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Lawrence M. Baskir, Esq. | |||
| 11/12/1993 | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (14 pages--Taped) (8/10/93 proceedings) | |||
| 11/12/1993 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 11/16/1993 | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |||
| 12/23/1993 | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS | Granted | ||
| 02/15/1994 | ORD GRT COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONand the motion is granted and the appointment of Lawrence M. Baskir, Esquire, is hereby vacated and Peter Meyer, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. Lawrence M. Baskir, Esquire, shall transmit all documents pertaining to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. F/O that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 daysthereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By RO) | |||
| 02/15/1994 | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Peter H. Meyers, Esq. | |||
| 03/28/1994 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF TO AND INCLUDING APRIL 27, 1994 (NO OPPO). | |||
| 03/31/1994 | ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF on or before April 27, 1994. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (by: WHN) | |||
| 04/20/1994 | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS) AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT. | Denied as Moot | ||
| 04/27/1994 | TMC - counsel's motion for leave to withdraw (anders) | |||
| 05/12/1994 | In the Above case, your court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw from this appeal. If you wish, you may file a response to your attorney's motion by the date set forth in the attached order. In your response, you should set out your reasons why your attorney should not be permitted to withdraw. You may also set forth any grounds for appeal you believe you may have. In the event you need additional time within which to respond, you must advise the court in writing using the self addressed stamped envelope provided. After your response has been received or the time for filing has expired, the motion and any response you may make will be submitted to the court for its consideration. The court will also review the record of the trial proceedings including the court reporter's transcript. If the court concludes the appeal lacks merit and grants the motion of your court-appointed counsel to withdraw, the appeal may be dismissed. Therefore, it is important that you file a response to the motion if your believe there are grounds for appeal. | |||
| 05/12/1994 | ORDER: Appellant shall file by June 24, 1994, any response showing cause why counsel's motion should not be granted, the appeal dismissed, and the judgment from which the appeal was taken affirmed. Failure to respond shall result in the motion being submitted for decision on the motion and record alone. (By Ferren) | |||
| 07/27/1994 | ORDER that these appeals are dismissed as moot. (by: FESTRE) | |||
| 07/27/1994 | DISMISSED | |||
| 07/27/1994 | ORDER DENY COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS) AS MOOT. (by: FESTRE) | |||
| 08/18/1994 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||