DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. RICKY BROGSDALE

Case Information: 94-CV-0260
Short Caption:	DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. RICKY BROGSDALE	Classification:	Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:	CA7021-92	Filed Date:	03/02/1994
Opening Event Date:	03/02/1994	Case Status:	Closed
Record Completed:	09/09/1994	Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:		Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:	09/13/1996

Events
Event Date	Status	Description	Result
03/02/1994		NOTICE OF APPEAL
03/22/1994		RECEIVED Memorandum and Order from Superior Court signed by Judge Arthur L. Burnett, Sr.
03/28/1994		RECEIVED apellant's docketing statement. (Need signature for the certificate of service, and also needs a motion for leave to file ads, dr & srt.
03/28/1994		error
03/28/1994		RECEIVED designation of record.
03/28/1994		RECEIVED statement regarding transcript.
03/29/1994		APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS, dr & srt.
04/04/1994		APPEARANCE filed by Robert C. Hauhart & Vincent Wilkins, Jr., counsel for appellee.
04/28/1994		RECORD ON APPEAL
05/03/1994		ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS, SRT & DR.
05/03/1994		APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
05/03/1994		DESIGNATION OF RECORD
05/03/1994		STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S)
09/09/1994		SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (52 pgs -- Sargent-Burns) (8/3/93 proc.)
09/09/1994		RECORD COMPLETED
12/02/1994		ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By WHN)
01/12/1995		APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until February 10, 1995.
01/13/1995		APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE
01/19/1995		TMC - 1/13 Aple's mot for summ affirm 1/12 Mot of aplt for ext of time to fl brief
01/20/1995		APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION by the district of columbia to motion for summary affirmance.
01/31/1995		APPELLEE'S REPLY on pending motion for summary affirmance.
03/10/1995		ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEFand the brief of appellant shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (By STKGBE)
03/10/1995		ORDER DENY APPELLEE MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE (By STKGBE)
03/31/1995		APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY - briefing schedule
04/04/1995		APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to schedule four related cases before the same division for argument.
04/06/1995		APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to appellants motion for stay.
04/11/1995		STATEMENT - aplt FELIX statement in support of aple BROGSDALE'S motion to schedule four related cases befor e the samme division for argument and in opposition to DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MOTION FOR STAY
04/11/1995		APPELLANT'S REPLY - by the aplt to BROGSDALE'S opposition to motion for stay of briefing and opposition by the D.C. to BROGSDALE'S motion to schedule four cases before same panel
04/13/1995		Appellant Abdullah's statement in support of appellee Brogsdale motion to schedule four related cases before the same division of argument and in opposition to district of columbia's motion for stay.
04/19/1995		APPELLANT'S REPLY - on motion to schedule four cases before the same panel
05/17/1995		TMC - 3/31 Motion by the D.C. for stay of briefing 4/4 Aple's motion to schedule four related cases before the same division & oppo to D.C.'s motion to stay. 4/6 Aple's oppo to D.C. motion for stay 4/11 Aplt Felix's Statement (no. 94-SP-293 & (no. 94-CV-260) 4/11 Reply by D.C. & Oppo 4/13 Aplt Abdullah's statement (no. 93-CV-1275) 4/13 Aplt Abdullah's statement (no. 94-SP-293) 4/13 Aplt Abdullah's statement (no. 94-SP-385) 4/13 Aplt Abdullah's statement (no. 94-CV-260) 4/19 Aplt reply on mot to schedule four cases before the same panel.
06/07/1995		ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT MOTIONS FOR STAY of the District of Columbia to stay the briefing in nos. 94-CV-260 and 94-SP-1134 are granted to the extent that the briefs in these cases shall be filed within 30 days after the dispositionof no. 94-SP-293, Abdullah v. Roach; no. 94-SP-385, Felix v. Braxton; and no. 93-CV-1275, Walton v. District of Columbia. (By ST, SC, KN) (More)
06/07/1995		ORDER DENY APLE MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION in no. 94-CV-260 to schedule four related cases before the same division for argument.
08/05/1996		APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL
08/22/1996		PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED
08/22/1996		ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEALand this appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 42 (b). (By: AMW)
08/22/1996		DISMISSED
09/13/1996		MANDATE ISSUED