judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

RICHARD L. FLEMING, SR V. PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL

Case Information: 94-CV-1021
Short Caption:RICHARD L. FLEMING, SR V. PROVIDENCE HOSPITALClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CA5355-93Filed Date:08/10/1994

Opening Event Date:08/10/1994Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/02/1998Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:08/07/1998

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantRichard L. Fleming NPro SeN
AppelleeProvidence HospitalN
Harry J. CarletonNY

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
08/10/1994NOTICE OF APPEAL
08/22/1994APPELLANT'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
08/22/1994APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE with case 93-CV-1621.
08/22/1994APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
10/18/1994ORDER On consideration of appellant's pro se motion to file request for permission to present oral argument late, the lodged request to present oral argument, appellee's opposition to the motion; appellant's motions and affidavits to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in appeal numbers 94-CV-1021 & 94-CV-1026; and appellant's motions to consolidate theabove-captioned appeals it is ORDERED on behalf of the merits division to consider these appeals, that appellant's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in appeal numbers 94-CV-1021 and 94-CV-1026 are granted. It is FURTHERED ORDERED, sua sponte, that appeal number 93-CV-1621 is removed from the summary I calendar of October 31, 1994. It is FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that the appellant shall showcause, within thirty days from the date of this order, why appeal numbers 93-CV-1621 & 94-CV-1026 should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from non-final orders. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motions to consolidate are held in abeyance pending the resolution of the jurisdictional questions presented by these appeals.
05/21/1996ORDERED that appellant's motion to consolidate is denied as moot. It is F/O that the Clerk of the Superior Court shall prepare and transmit the record on appeal to this court without fee forthwith. (BY: GPJ)
03/02/1998RECORD ON APPEAL
03/02/1998RECORD COMPLETED
04/16/1998ORDER: The brief of appellant_ shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee_ shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: GP)
06/10/1998ORDER: Appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order shall subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: GP)
07/16/1998ORDER: This appeal is hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 14. (By: AMW)
07/16/1998DISMISSED
08/07/1998MANDATE ISSUED