judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

TONY KELLY V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 94-CO-1688
Short Caption:TONY KELLY V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Other - Other Criminal
Lead: 94-CO-1570 Consolidated: 94-CO-1571 , 94-CO-1688
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:F9375-86Filed Date:11/23/1994

Opening Event Date:11/23/1994Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:03/28/1997

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantTony Kelly N
Frazer Walton, Jr.NY
AppelleeUnited StatesN
John R. Fisher NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
11/23/1994NOTICE OF APPEAL - filed Tony Kelly
12/08/1994APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL filed in 94co1570 and 94co1571
01/19/1995RECORD ON APPEAL - for 94co1570
01/20/1995RECORD ON APPEAL for 94-CO-1571 & 94-CO-1688
02/21/1995SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (13 pgs - TAPE) (7/31/86 & 10/30/86 proceedings) See 94-CO-1571 for RT.
04/13/1995ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEALS nos. 94-CO-1570, 94-CO-1571 & 94-CO-1688.
04/13/1995ORDER GRANTING APLT MO FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL and Frazer Walton Jr., Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. F/O that appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement. (By AMW)
04/13/1995APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Frazer Walton, Jr., Esq.
04/27/1995APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT (Troy Kelly)
04/28/1995SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD # 2 (8/26/86 proc) 3 pages, Janice Hunt
08/03/1995COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS filed by: Frazer Walton, Jr. Denied Without Prejudice
05/30/1996SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (167 pgs - Swaringer) (3/5-6/87 proceedings) RT taken from 87-840
05/30/1996SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (45 pgs - Simms) (7/8/87 proceedings) RT taken from 87-840
05/30/1996SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (14 pgs - Simms) (6/15/87 proceedings) RT taken from 87-840
05/30/1996SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #4 (87 pgs - Mollichelli) (12/12-15/86 proceedings) RT taken from 87-840
05/30/1996SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #5 (5 pgs - Swaringer) (5/5/87 proceedings) RT taken from 87-840
06/28/1996ORD DNY COUNSEL MO TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONwithout prejudice to its renewal, within 30 days from the date of this order, accompanied by either a statement of appellant pro se that meets the requirements of Johnson v. United States, 513 A.2d 798 (D.C. 1986), or a motion pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). (By AMW)
07/12/1996RECEIVED -response to aplt counsel motion to withdraw
07/24/1996COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS Granted
08/07/1996ORDER: Appellant shall file by September 10, 1996, any response showing cause why counsel's motion should not be granted, the appeal dismissed, and the judgment from which the appeal was taken affirmed. Failure to respond shall result in the motion being submitted for decision on the motion and record alone. (By AMW)
08/07/1996In the Above case, your court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw from this appeal. If you wish, you may file a response to your attorney's motion by the date set forth in the attached order. In your response, you should set out your reasons why your attorney should not be permitted to withdraw. You may also set forth any grounds for appeal you believe you may have. In the event you need additional time within which to respond, you must advise the court in writing using the self addressed stamped envelope provided. After your response has been received or the time for filing has expired, the motion and any response you may make will be submitted to the court for its consideration. The court will also review the record of the trial proceedings including the court reporter's transcript. If the court concludes the appeal lacks merit and grants the motion of your court-appointed counsel to withdraw, the appeal may be dismissed. Therefore, it is important that you file a response to the motion if your believe there are grounds for appeal. (By: GPJ)
08/23/1996APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE - to motion to withdraw (anders)
09/10/1996RECEIVED appellant's pro se motion for transcripts
09/11/1996TMC - Response to appellate counsel's motion to withdraw - Motion to withdraw as counsel in the above appeals - Response motion to appointed appellate counsel's motion to withdraw
03/06/1997ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the lodged motion of appellant for transcripts. (by: FEPYKN)
03/06/1997APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for transcripts.
03/06/1997ORDERED that the moiton of appellant for transcript is struck as improperly filed. (by: FEPYKN)
03/06/1997JUDGMENT GRANT COUNSEL MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS) It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal be, and hereby is, affirmed. (by: FEPYKN)
03/06/1997AFFIRMED
03/28/1997MANDATE ISSUED
04/01/1997APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to recall the mandate
04/18/1997TMC - Aplt's motion to recall the mandate
06/05/1997ORDER DENY APLT MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to recall the mandate. (by: FEPYKN)
07/22/1997RECEIVED - aplt's mot to stay mandate
07/29/1997ORDER On consideration of pro se appellant's motion to stay mandate, and it appearing that the mandatein these matters issued on March 28, 1997, it is ORDERED that the motion is denied. (FE/PY/KN)