| Case Information: 94-CV-0401 | |||
| Short Caption: | KINGDON GOULD, JR. V. ANTONELLI CREDITORS LIQUIDATING TRUST | Classification: | Appeals - Civil - Other Civil |
| Lead: | 94-CV-0401 | Consolidated: | 94-CV-0402 |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | CA3708-93 | Filed Date: | 04/04/1994 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 04/04/1994 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | 06/28/1994 | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | |
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 11/07/1994 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||||||||
| Appellant | Kingdon Gould, Jr. | N | |||||||||||||
| Appellee | Antonelli Creditors Liquidating Trust | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Appellee | Bailey Realty Corporation | N |
| ||||||||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 04/04/1994 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 04/13/1994 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE-w94cv402 | |||
| 04/13/1994 | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |||
| 04/13/1994 | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |||
| 04/13/1994 | $50.00 DOCKETING FEE | |||
| 04/13/1994 | STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S) | |||
| 04/13/1994 | DESIGNATION OF RECORD | |||
| 05/06/1994 | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE and appeal nos. 94-CV-401 and 94-CV-402 are consolidated for all purposes. (By JMF) | |||
| 06/28/1994 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
| 06/28/1994 | RECORD COMPLETED | |||
| 08/11/1994 | ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By WHN) | |||
| 09/19/1994 | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until 10/14/94. | |||
| 09/19/1994 | MOTION(S) FEE PAID | |||
| 10/04/1994 | STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL | |||
| 10/14/1994 | ORDER - that these appeals are hereby dismissed. See D.C. App. R. 42(b). F/O that the motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the brief is denied as moot. (By AMW) | |||
| 10/14/1994 | DISMISSED | |||
| 11/07/1994 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||