judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

SHARON PRATT KELLY ET AL V. PARENTS UNITED FOR D.C. SCHOOLS

Case Information: 92-CV-1126
Short Caption:SHARON PRATT KELLY ET AL V. PARENTS UNITED FOR D.C. SCHOOLSClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Lead: 90-CV-1130 Consolidated: 90-CV-1158 , 92-CV-1126
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CA8377-89Filed Date:09/18/1992

Opening Event Date:09/18/1992Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:11/23/1992Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:05/21/1993
Argued/Submitted:01/11/1994
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/16/1995

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantSharon Pratt Kelly N
Donna M. MuraskyYY
Charles L. Reischel NN
AppelleeParents United for the D.C. Public SchoolsN
Roderic V.O. Boggs NN
G. Brian Busey YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
09/06/1990NOTICE OF APPEAL
09/18/1990NOTICE OF APPEAL
09/18/1992NOTICE OF APPEAL
09/29/1992APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE w/92cv1130
10/22/1992APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to court's ord dtd 10/21/92
11/03/1992APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS and the lodged docketing statement, designation of record and statement regarding transcript are filed. F/O that the Clerk of Superior Court shall prepare and transmit the record on appeal in appeal no. 92-CV-1126 to this court forthwith. (BY WHN)
11/03/1992APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
11/03/1992DESIGNATION OF RECORD
11/03/1992STATEMENT REGARDING TRANSCRIPT(S)
11/23/1992RECORD ON APPEAL in case 92cv1126.
11/23/1992RECORD COMPLETED
02/09/1993ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By WHN)
02/24/1993APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until 4/21/93.
03/11/1993ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the brief of appellants/cross-appellees shall be filed on or before April 21, 1993. (NFX) (BY WHN)
04/21/1993APPELLANT'S BRIEF sharon pratt kelley
05/21/1993APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S BRIEF
05/21/1993BRIEFS COMPLETED
05/27/1993APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to 1 week
06/11/1993ORDER GRANT APLT-X-APLE MO TO EXT TM TO FILE BRIEF and the brief of appellants/cross-appellees shall be filed on or before July 6, 1993. (BY WHN)
06/29/1993APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to July 20, 1993.
07/16/1993ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (reply), and the reply brief of appellants/cross-appellees shall be filed on or before July 20, 1993. (BY WHN)
07/20/1993APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF and Brief for Sharon P. Kelly, Et Al as cross-appellees.
08/05/1993RECEIVED - reply brief of aple/aplt (parents united)
08/06/1993APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION cross aplt's for leave to file reply brief
08/06/1993MOTION(S) FEE PAID
09/10/1993ORDER GRANT APLE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file the reply brief, and the lodged reply brief is filed. (BEARB) (BY WHN)
09/10/1993APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF
11/08/1993FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
01/05/1994CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 - Transmitted to division on January 6, 1994.
01/11/1994FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
01/11/1994ARGUED (FE,SC,PR) Donna M. Murasky, Esquire, for appellant. Leslie J. Cloutier, Esquire, for appellee.
01/11/1994CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 - Transmitted to division 1/11/94
01/13/1994CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 1/14/94 (Trans) by JAC
03/29/1994CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28
04/04/1994MEMORANDUM - Trans to division correspondence rec'd from counsel for appellant on March 29, 1994, pursuant to Rule 28 k.
04/21/1994AFFIRMED IN PART/REVERSED IN PART/REMANDED OPINION
05/05/1994ORDER Sua Sponte that pate 22 of the slip opinion rleased on 4/21/94 be amended as follows: the disposition changed form Reversed and remanded to Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
05/09/1994ORD GRT APLT MO TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PET FOR REH on or before May 26, 1994. (FE)
05/26/1994APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC
06/08/1994ORDER directing Parents United for D.C. Public Schools, et al. within 20 days from the date of this order shall file a response to pet for reh/reh en banc (10 copies). (FE)
06/28/1994APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE -to petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc
07/12/1994RECEIVED appellant's reply to response to petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc.
07/12/1994APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY to response to petition for reharing or rehearing en banc.
07/20/1994CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED by: Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs 1300 19th Street, N.W. Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 835-0031
09/28/1994ORDER The peition is granted to the extent reflected in this order: 1. In Kelly v. Parents United for the District of Columbia Public School, 641 A.2d 159 (D.C. 1994), the following footnote 13A shall be added at 641 A.2d 165, second column, second full paragraph, as follows: ...whether the Nurse Assignment Act creates an implied private right of action {13A} it follows that.... Per Curiam (FE,SC,PR)
10/03/1994APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file supplement to rehearing petition.
10/03/1994RECEIVED Supplement to petition for rehearing or for rehearing en banc.
10/17/1994APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to the District's motion for leave to file a supplement in support of the District's petition for rehearing.
10/18/1994APPELLEE'S REPLY to opposition to the District's motion for leave to file a supplement to petition for rehearing or for rehearing en banc.
10/19/1994APPELLANT'S REPLY to opposition to the District's motion for leave to file a supplement to petition for rehearing or for rehearing en banc.
10/24/1994ORDER On consideration of the pet for reh/reh en banc filed by aplts/x-aples, as supplemented, the court has concluded that addt'l briefing is necessary to assist it in deciding whether to grant the petition. Therefore, the parties shall, by supplemental memoranda filed simultaneously on or before November 30, 1994, address the issues as stated in this order. (EB) (Associate Judge King is recused from these cases.)
11/28/1994APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for enlargement of time to file supplemental memorandum pursuant to this court's 10/24/94 order. (unopposed)
11/28/1994MOTION(S) FEE PAID
11/29/1994APLE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSEto 30 days
12/05/1994ORD GRANT APLE MO TO EXT TIME TO FILE SUPPL BRIEF on or before December 14, 1994. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (WA)
12/08/1994APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to establish simultaneous extension deadlines for supplemental memoranda requested in this court's 10/24/94 order. (no oppo)
12/08/1994MOTION(S) FEE PAID
12/29/1994RECEIVED appellant's response to this court's order of October 24, 1994.
12/30/1994RECEIVED appellees' supplemental memorandum in response to this court's order of October 24, 1994.
01/05/1995ORDER grant the motions of appellants and appellees to extend time to file response to this court's order of October 24, 1994, and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged responses. (EB) (Judges King and Ruiz are recused from these cases.)
01/05/1995APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM to this court's order of October 24, 1994
01/05/1995APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM to this court's order of October 24, 1994.
11/08/1995ORDER DENYING APLT PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC and grant the motion of aplt/x-aple for leave to file reply and the motion for leave to file supplement to petition and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged reply and the lodged supplement. (Judges King, Ruiz, and Reid are recused from these cases.) (Judges Wagner and Terry would grant rehearing en banc.) (EB)
11/08/1995APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELEE'S REPLY to reponse to petition for rehearing en banc
11/08/1995APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in support of petition for rehearing en banc
11/16/1995MANDATE ISSUED
05/21/1996ORDER On further consideration of the pet of aplts/ cross-aples for reh and the suppl briefs filed by the parties, it is Ordered that, except for that portion of the pet for reh resolved by this court's order filed Sept. 28, 1994, the remainder of aplts/cross-aples' petition for rehearing is denied. (FE,SC,PY)