| Case Information: 94-CO-0355 | |||
| Short Caption: | CURTIS CRAWFORD V. UNITED STATES | Classification: | Appeals - Criminal Other - Other Criminal |
| Superior Court or Agency Case Number: | F9564-93 | Filed Date: | 03/22/1994 |
| | |||
| Opening Event Date: | 03/22/1994 | Case Status: | Closed |
| Record Completed: | Post-Decision Matter Pending: | ||
| Briefs Completed: | |||
| Argued/Submitted: | |||
| Disposition: | Next Scheduled Action: | ||
| Mandate Issued: | 09/19/1994 | ||
| Party Information | |||||||||
| Appellate Role | Party Name | IFP | Attorney(s) | Arguing Attorney | E-Filer | ||||
| Appellant | Curtis Crawford | N | Pro Se | N | |||||
| Appellee | United States | N |
| ||||||
| Events | ||||
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result | |
| 03/22/1994 | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |||
| 04/26/1994 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |||
| 06/10/1994 | ORDER appellant in 20 days shall show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a judgment of acquittal. (By FE) | |||
| 06/22/1994 | APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE ,motion fo r appointment of counsel, motion for consolidation of all related cases filed in appeal. | |||
| 06/29/1994 | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION - of aplt in request for trial transcript | |||
| 07/07/1994 | LETTER- from aplt would like the court to notify him of any orders in the case | |||
| 08/03/1994 | LETTER from pro se appellant requesting of the last order of D.C.C.A. | |||
| 08/26/1994 | ORDER DENY APLT MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to recall the mandate and reinstate appeal no. 93-CO-1239. (by: SCFAPR) | |||
| 08/26/1994 | Order Denying | |||
| 08/26/1994 | ORDER DENYING appellant's moiton for reconsideration of the dismissal of appeal no. 94-CO-240. (by: SCFAPR) | |||
| 08/26/1994 | ORDER DENYING appellant's motion for an exlargement of time to respond to the order to show cause in no. 94-CO-355. (by: SCFAPR) | |||
| 08/26/1994 | ORDER that appeal no. 94-CO-355 is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from a judgment of acquittal. F/O that all other outstanding motions in appeal nos. 93-CO-1239, 93-CO-1608, 93-SP-1350, 94-CO-240, and 94-CO-355 are denied as moot. (by: SCFAPR) | |||
| 08/26/1994 | DISMISSED no. 94-CO-355 | |||
| 09/19/1994 | MANDATE ISSUED | |||