| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 10/14/1992 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 11/09/1992 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Kenneth D. Auerbach, Esq. | |
| 12/08/1992 | | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
| 12/15/1992 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the docketing statement out of time, setting forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the docketing statement or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this court may result in his appointment being vacated. (By RO) | |
| 12/22/1992 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #1 (order/Judge Z. Rankin dtd 12/14/92) | |
| 12/23/1992 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY to order of 12/15/92. | |
| 02/18/1993 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the docketing statement out of time, setting forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the docketing statement or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this court may result in his appointment being vacated. (By WHN) | |
| 02/23/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS (pldg. titled Counsel's reply to order of December 15, 1992. ... To be used as a MALDS) | |
| 02/23/1993 | | RECEIVED appellant's docketing statement. | |
| 02/25/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD # (Order of Judge Mitchell- Rankin dated 2/19/93) | |
| 03/04/1993 | | ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS and the lodged docketing statement is filed. F/O that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee 30 days thereafter. NFX. (By WHG) | |
| 03/04/1993 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
| 03/10/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until completion of transcript. | |
| 03/24/1993 | | ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date the transcript is filed with this court. (BY WHN) | |
| 04/16/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (80 pgs. - Tanner) (7/23/92 proc.) | |
| 06/14/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #4 (136 pgs/Finnerin) 7/24/92 proc. | |
| 06/21/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #5 (8 pgs. -- Pirfo) (10/1/92 proceedings) | |
| 06/21/1993 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 07/14/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to stay the briefing (23-110 to be filed) (evh) | |
| 12/16/1993 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to stay appeal pending disposition of a motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C Code 23-110, and this appeal is hereby stayed pending further order of this court. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only be filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 a.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). F/O that counsel for appellant shall advise this court within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the proceedings in thetrial court. (By: (JWR) | |
| 12/16/1993 | | CASE STAYED | |
| 01/18/1994 | | STATEMENT (status report) | |
| 03/02/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court prusuant to D.C Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. U.S., 559 A.2d 1321,1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: WHN) | |
| 04/01/1994 | | STATEMENT - status report to court's order dated March 2, 1994. | |
| 05/10/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, asto the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US. (By: WHN) | |
| 06/21/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this co urt within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By WHG) | |
| 06/21/1994 | | STATEMENT from appellant re: Judge Mitchell- Rankins intent to issue order setting a status hearing for a return date for a production of documents and other records. | |
| 07/12/1994 | | STATEMENT filed by appellant (status report). | |
| 08/09/1994 | | ORDER appellant shall advise this court within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the 23-110 motion pending in the trial court. (By WHN) | |
| 09/08/1994 | | STATEMENT- of aplt re: status report of case | |
| 10/20/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US. (By: WHN) | |
| 11/22/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION - to permit filing of status report | |
| 11/22/1994 | | RECEIVED - status report | |
| 12/20/1994 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to permit filing of lodged status report. F/O that counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 20 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court ursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By WHG) | |
| 12/20/1994 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 02/03/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this co urt within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By WHG) | |
| 02/22/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 06/20/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: WHN) | |
| 07/20/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 10/24/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: WHN) | |
| 01/16/1997 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION to set briefing schedule (consent) | |
| 01/24/1997 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
| 01/24/1997 | | ORDERED, sua sponte, that the stay entered on December 16, 1993, is hereby vacated. It is F/O that the motion of appellant to set briefing is granted, and the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extensio nof time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (BY: AMW) | |
| 03/10/1997 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until March 13, 1997. (consent) | |
| 03/18/1997 | | ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEFto the extent that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 15 days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (By: GP) | |
| 04/02/1997 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
| 05/06/1997 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
| 05/06/1997 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 05/16/1997 | | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |
| 10/01/1997 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 10/01/1997 | | SUBMITTED (FA,KG,RU) | |
| 10/07/1997 | | AFFIRMED MOJ (FA,KG,RU) | |
| 10/29/1997 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |